Full Text for Papam Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum (Text)
er die Scbafe ull terweise. wi.
5ie rfcbte Cbri,ten sollen soin. sondern
auch dnnebcn den Woollen w.hr .... dass
ie die Scbafo nicbt angrelfen und mit
fnIscher Lohre verfuehren und Irrtum ein·
fllehren. - Luther.
Es i,t kein Ding. das die Leute mebr
bei der Kirche behaelt denn die gute
Predigt. - Apo/Ollie. Art. 2.+.
II the trumpet give an uncertain Bound.
who 'hall prepare himself to tbe battle!
1 Cor. L+. 8.
Published for the
E v. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States
CONCORDIA PU:BLISHI NG HOUSE, St. Louis, Mo.
424 "Papam Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum."
mortHdj finb fitr aUe ~oirrungen, audj aUf bern ®ebie± ber 2efjre, nidjt
nur in ifjrer eigenen @cmeinbe, fonbern aud) in ber Sl:ird)engemeinfd)aft,
3U ber fie \clefjoren: ~ofj. 10, 5 (,,(Einem ~remben aoer f 0 f 9 en fie
n i d) t n a cfj; benn fie fennen ber ~remben €±tmme nidjt"), 1 ~ofj. 4, 1
(,,~fjr 2ieoen, glaubet nidjt einem jegHdjen ®eift, fonbern p r u f et
bie @eifter, ob fie bon @ot± finb"); 2 ~ofj.l0 (,,€o jemanb au
eudj fommt unb b ri n 9 t b i e f e 2 e fj r e n i d) t, ben n e fj m et
n i dj ± in § &;;l au § unb grutei ifjn audj nidjt"). 2Iudj ben 2aiew
gHebern mut bafjer gegebenenfaU§ 3um ?EcltlU13tf ein georadj± il1crben,
bat fie fid) im falf d)en 2ager oefinben unb barum Ieid)t fidj frember
€unben teiIfjaftig mad)en fLinnen: ®aL 3,1 (">mer fjat cud) beaaubed,
bat ifjr ber >mafjrfjeit nidjt gefjordjet?"), @aL 5, £) (,,(Einmenig €auer~
teig berf iiued ben ganaen ~eig").
~pologie, 242, § 48: ,,~od) foU man faIfdje 2efjtet nidjt
an n e fj men ober fjoren; benn biefcIoigen finb nidjt mefjr an C£fjtiftu§'
€tait, fonbern finb >miberdjrifti."
€d)maUafbifdje ~rmeI, 518, § 52: ,,~arum foUen gotte§furd)±ige
2eute fold)e gteuHdje ~rrllimer be§ ~apf±cs unb feine ~t)rannei mofjI
oebenren unb aum erfien mifjen, bat fofdjc;s r r± u mer all fI i e fj en
unb bie rcdjte 2efjre ber 0:fjre ®otie§ unb ber €eeIen €efigfeit fjaIDen
an3unefjmen fei."
€djmaIfalbifdje 2frtifeI, 520, § 58: ,,€o ftefji ®oite§ mefefjI unb
>mort ba, bat mit ~ogottetei, f a If d) e 2 e fj t e unb unbiUige >muterer
ff i e fj en f 0 II en. "
€djmaIl'albifd)e 2frtil'eI, 524, § 72: ,,~enn fo geoietet \l5aulu§,
bat ane ?EifdJofe, 10 enthJeber f e 16 ft un r e di i Ie fj r en ober II n ~
ted) i e 2 e fj t e unb fali dien ®ottesbienf± bert e i big en, fut
ft t ii f rid) e 2 e ute fonen gefjaIten merben."
@roBer Sl:atedii§muB, 572, § 17: ,,~enn baB mut ja fein, lner
bie 8efjn ®eoo±e hJofjI unb gar Tann, bat ber mut bie ganae €djrif±
l'onnen, bat et fonlle in aUen €ad)en unb ~iiUen w±en, fjeIfen, ±toften,
m±eHen, tidi±en beibe geiftridj unb hJeItridi >mefen unb moge fein e i n
mid) ± e r u 0 era r I e 2 e fj t e, €±iinbe, @eiftet, medite, UnD ma§ in
ber >md± fein mag." ~. (E. Sftetmann.
4 II ~
ill ESSE :psum Verum .L·~ntichristt1m."
"Haee. doctrina praeelare ostenclit papam esse ips~Lm verum anti-
e711'istum, qtti supm et contra Chrishlm sese extuZit." "This teaching
shows forcefully that the Pope is the very Antichrist, who has exalted
himself above, and oP1Josod himself ag8inst, Christ, because he will
not p~rmit Christians to be saved without his power, which, never-
theless, is nothing and is neither ordained llOT co=anded by God."
(Smalcald Articles, Part II, Art. IV, Cone. TrigZ., 474f.) There is
nothing uncertain or ambiguous about this statement, and it will be
well for us to set forth, chiefly on the basis of Scripture, but with
certain digressions also into the field of history, just why we firmly
hold to the declaration given in the caption of this article.
"Papam Esse Ipsum Verum Antichdstum." 425
'iVhat are the characteristics of antichristianism, and what dis-
tinction does Holy Scripture make between antichrists in general and
the one Antichrist %a,' :!I;oX1)V in particular? The answer to this double
question can best be given 011 the basis of several passages in the
epistles of J olm. In 1 J olm 2, 18 we read: "Little children, the last
hom· it is; and just as you heard that Antichrist is coming, even now
many antichrists lwve come into existence, whence we recognize that
it is the last hour." In 1 J olm 4, 1 we are told: "Beloved, do not
yield belief to every spirit, but test the spirits whether they are of
God, for many ll5MbcZOllT'ophets have gone out into the world." And
in 2 J olm 7: "For many deceiveTs have been going out into the world,
such as do not make the confession of Jesus Ohrist as coming in the
flesh." It is clear from these three passages that antichristianism
is represented, in general, by men who are false prophets or deceivers,
to whom the Holy Ghost applies the specific name "antichrists," the
word itself indicating an atmosphere of rivalry, giving color to
hostility. Antichristianism is in its very nature a phenomenon of
this present a low, of the world, that which will find its end and
culmination on the Day of Judgment. It is not an external POW8l'
arising against the Ohristian Ohurch and the Ohristian faith, but it
is a movement represented by many deceivers or false prophets who
have fallen away from the tTuth while still outwardly connected with
the Ohurch, so that it was only their going out (v. 19) which made
them known as no longer belonging to the Ohurch. They arise, they
come into existence, within the Ohurch, and then the sepm·ation takes
place. It is not stated that this separation means a physical removal,
for unfortunately in many instances the false teachers pervert whole
congregations and thus remain in their positions of honor and in-
fluence. The e~l(}XBG1'}at is further explained by the 9'aVB(}Ova{}at; for
it is the revealing of their antichristian teaching on the part of the
faithful teachers that is equivalent to their removal from the ranks
of the orthodox believers. The serious aspect of antichristianism is
brought out by the words of the apostle, which characterize their
false teaching not as a mere aberration in a minor point of doctrine,
but as a refusal to make confession of Jesus Ohrist as coming in the
flesh. In other words, antichristianism subverts the doctrines of
christology and soteriology, the whole basis of objective justification
as taught in Holy Writ, thereby destroying the fundamental facts of
salvation.
It is evident that antichristianism was not confined to Gnosticism,
Manichaeism, or any other of the early heresies which subverted the
truth of the objective salvation and justification, but is found through-
out this last aeon of the world wherever and whenever teachers of this
type arise in the Ohurch. There have been antichrists in every period
of the Ohurch's history. The Apostolic Age had its Judaizing
426 "Pap am Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum."
teachers, the subapostolic age its Gnostics, the period immediately
preceding Nicaea the heresies enumerated by Ireneaus, the period
following Nicaea the Arians, the period of the later ecumenical
councils it.s N estorians, Monophysites, and Monothelites, the later
Middle Ages the Bogomiles, the Oathari, the Albigenses, and the
Petro-Brussians, the period since the Reformation the great mass of
anti-Trinitarian and antichristian sects whose false doctrines have
culminated in the theology of the social gospel and in Modernism.
But Holy Scripture speaks not only of antichrists and pseudo-
prophets of this kind. In a very emphat.ic manner the Ohristians of
all times are warned against one great Antichrist, a phenomenon in
history which is unique in almost every respect. The three passages
in John's epistles from which we have quoted make a very clear
distinction between antichristianism as represented by the minor
antichrists and the one Antichrist xar' S~Ox~Y, even though the latter
is described as possessing some of the characteristics of the former.
1 John 2, 18 expressly states: "Antichrist is coming," the absence of
the article giving the subject the force of a propel' noun. 1 John 2, 22
dedllres: "This is the Anticluist, who den£es the Father and the
Son." In 1 John4,3 we read: "And every spirit that does not con-
fess Jesus is not of God; and this is that of the Antichrist, who, as
you have heard, is corning and now is a,lready in the wo1'ld." Here
we must again add 2 John 7b: "This is the deceiver and the Anti-
christ."
The characteristics of the Antichrist as given by the Apostle John
are the following: He has the spirit that does not confess Jesus; he
denies the Father and the Son; and he is a deceiver. Of this Anti-
christ it is said that he both is coming and that he is already in the
world. In other words, he represented a power which was even then
in existence, but was also in process of coming, and the most dis-
tinguishing feature of his character is given as the denial of the
Father and of the Son, specifically of Jesus.
The Apostle John, in 1 John 4, 3, refers to the fact that his
readers had heard of the coming of the Antichrist, and there can be
no doubt that he intends to have them recall what they had heard from
the Apostle Paul, particularly in the latter's exposition in 2 Thess. 2,
3-12. The points which are enumerated in this loct~s classic~~s on the
doctrine of the Antichrist are t.he following. The apostle speakR, v. 3,
of the apostasy, of the falling away from the truth, a denial therefore
of such large proportions that it is particularly designated with the
specific article. Not only was this apostasy to precede the coming of
the Last Day, but also the re1Jealing of the man of lawlessness, a man
who would be characterized by his rebellion against the Law of God,
against the revealed truth and will. This person is then called the
son of perdition. As he peculiarly belongs to sin, is the representative
"Papam Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum." 427
of sin, its personification, so he is the son of eternal condemnation and
destruction, one who is destined to eternal damnation on account of
his rebellion. - It is further said of the Antichrist that he sets him-
self, and vaunts himself above, all that is called God 01' an object of
worship, so that he sets himself into the temple of God, showing him-
self forth that he is God. Scripture ascribes the title god not only to
the one true God, who is above all, but also to the principalities and
powers of heaven (Ps. 9'7, '7, cpo with Heb. 1, 6) as well as to rulers on
earth, who govern as the higher powers ordained by God (Ps. 82, 1. 6,
cpo with John 10, 34; Ex. 22,28). Above all these, yea, above the one
true God, who alone bears the title with full right, the Antichrist
would exalt and vaunt himself. He would do the same with regard
to every r1s{Jar1p-a, every object and every form of worship. So great
would this pride and usurpation finally become that the Antichrist
would even presume to occupy the temple of God and to exercise the
prerogatives of God. It is significant that present participles are used
throughout this verse, indicating the enduring nature of the phenom-
enon, and that the temple of God is referred to, evidently not one
built of wood or stone, but a spiritual structure, as frequently in the
New Testament. Op.l Oor. 3, 16.11.
The description continues in v. 6: And now you know what with-
holds that he may be revealed in his own time. At the time when
the Apostle Paul was writing to the Thessalonians there was still
something, some power, some hindrance, which was restraining the
Antichrist from being revealed before his appointed time. The
restraint was in keeping with the purpose of God, for it was His in-
tention to make known, to expose, the Antichrist at the time ap-
pointed by Him. - The apostle next explains why and in what sense
he speaks of a revealing of the man of lawlessness: For the mystery
of lawlessness is active even now, only until he who restrains for the
present is out of the way. The apostle saw before him the scattered,
shapeless mass of ungodliness, of lawlessness, which was to gain form
and personality in the Antichrist. The movement which later cul-
minated in the reign of the Antichrist was at that time still hidden
and covered; it had not yet come out into the open; one could not
as yet point out specific instances of its destructive power. It was
indeed at work; it was active in certain phenomena and develop-
ments, in certain usurpations of power, in certain tyrannical excres-
cences instigated by unruly spirits. Against a clear and unmistakable
manifestation of power, however, another force was at that time active,
one which made it impossible for the lawlessness of the Antichrist to
carry out his design. The 0 uarsxrov is clearly not an individual
person, but a representative of a power (TO uadxov) whose activityex-
tended over some time. In the same way the mystery of iniquity is
spoken of as a person, for the mystery of lawlessness finally found
its culmination in the Lawless One.
428 "Pap am Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum."
This is spoken of in v. 8: And then the Lawless One shall be
revealed, whom the LMd Jesgs shall consume with the breath of His
mouth, and He shall make an end of him by the appearing of His
coming. Here both the revelation and the final disposition of the
Antichrist are included in one short statement. Then, or at that time,
namely, when the restriction shall have been removed which was still
interfering with the open execution of the allollJa, then the proud
one, the Lawless One, would appear before the eyes of the world with-
out any cloak or covering. Throughout the last aeon of the world
the Lawless One would then be active, until the Lord would bring
upon him his final destiny, namely, in His great pa1'01lsia, when He
would destroy, or consume, him with the breath of His mouth.-
Meanwhile, however, the Anticl1l'ist would continue his nefarious ac-
tivity: Whose coming is after the working of Satan in all power and
signs and lying miracles and in all deceitfulness of 1mrighteotLsness
to them that are lost, because they did not accept the love of the truth
that they might be saved, vv. 9. 10. So the man of lawlessness, or
wickedness, was to derive his power, or energy, from Satan, and the
strength that he was to wield would be that of a lie, just as the: signs
and wonders would be products of lies and frauds. At the same time
he would continue in all deceit of unrighteousness, having a glittering
show of righteousness and holiness, with good works, pomp, and show
flaunted before the eyes of the world at all times, so that his influence
and power would have results among those who would be perishing,
for nIl those who would actually support the system, with a knowledge
of its falsehood, would thereby forfeit their claim to salvation.
On account of their perversity, as a just recompense for their
refusal to accept the truth, the Lord would give the adherents of the
Antichrist up to their obduration: And for this reason Gael sends
them w01'king of delusion that they should believe the falsehood, that
all might be judged who did not believe the truth, but had pleasure in
umighteousness. God would punish all those who would be deliber-
ately disobedient by giving them up to the lie which they would choose
by preference. A power, or strength, of deception would enter their
hearts until they would refuse to return to the truth, since a devilish
perversion would take hold of them. And the end would be the con-
demnation of the Lord. Such is a brief exposition of the words of
the apostle in 2 Thess. 2.
If we now take the points given in the passages from J olm's
epistles and those contained in 2 Thess. 2, we have the following list:
1. The Antichrist is not any particular individual, but a represen-
tative perSOll, or a power represented by a person or in a verdon.
2. He was in process of coming', or development, as early as the
middle of the first century, when the mystery of lawlessness was
already at work.
"Papam Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum." 429
3. He is not an outside person or power, but arose in the midst
of the Ohurch, in the temple of God.
4. The revelation of his lawlessness was hindered by a power
headed by a restraining person.
5. After the removal of this hindering influence the Antichrist
came out openly with his claims and was also revealed in his true
nature.
6. He was exposed before the world, but continued his activity
as the son of perdition.
7. He claims divine prerogatives for himself, vaunting himself
and raising himself above constituted authorities.
8. His doctrine is, in its last analysis, a denial of the :Father
and of the Son as revealed in both their persons and their work in
the Holy Scriptures.
9. He presumes to direct eyery object and every form of
worship.
10. He operates with lying wonders, that is, such as are based
upon lies and intended to spread lies.
11. He is constantly deceiving people who give credence to his
false claims.
12. He will not be destroyed until the Lord's great parousia.
It is surely a h8avy and scathing arraignment that ~W8 have
before us. IVe ask at once: To which historical phenomenon must
we apply the description 1 ~We answer without hesitation, on the basis
of the evidence which can easily be adduced, that the passages briefly
explained above apply to the Pope of Rome, with his whole system,
with his entire pernicious activity. Every statement applies with
unmistakable force.
1. Romanislll is a system personified in its head, who is thus
a representative person. IVe do not single out any particular in-
dividual' although some Popes were in their own persons more repre-
sentatiye of the system than others. Every new Pope simply inherits
the system and is the exponent of the system, quite frequently also its
spokesman.
2. The movement which culminated in the papal system had its
origin about the year 50 A. D., when the first indications of a hier-
archy with more or less evident powers began to appear. Passages
like Acts 20, 30 are prophetical as well as descriptive.
3. Romanism arose in the very midst of the Ohurch of Jesus
Ohrist, its very bishops being the ones who fostered the idea by their
hierarchical aspimtions and their gradual assumption of more powero
4. As long as the Roman EmpiTe, with the emperor at its head,
was in power, the Ohristian Ohurch not being a religio licita, the
aspirations of the hierarchy could not come to fruition.
5. When the Ohristian religion, at the time of Oonstantine, be-
came the state religion, the outward organization of the Ohurch could
be built up without hindrance, and this factor became still mOTe
prominent with the energetic efforts of Leo I to establish the tlu·one
of the Papacy. The end of the Western Empire (476 A. D.) was
merely an additional factor in the rise of the Papacy. From the end
of the fifth century onward the true character of the Papacy was re-
vealed more and more.
430 "Pap am Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum."
6. The Antichrist was exposed by Luther and was so recognized
at the time of the Reformation; but he l'ecovered from the blow, due
chiefly to the divisions in the Protestant ranks and the Jesuit Oounter-
Reformation, so that he has continued his pernicious activities to
this day.
7. As early as the year 445 A. D. Valentini an III, a monarch con-
trolled by Pope Leo I, passed this celebrated decree: "The primacy of
the Apostolic See having been established by the merit of St. Peter,
its founder, the sacred Oouncil of Nice, and the dignity of the city
of Rome, we thus declare our irrevocable edict that all bishops,
whether in Gaul or elsewhere, shall make no innovation without the
salwtion of the Bishop of Rome; and, that the Apostolic See may
remain inviolable, all bishops who shall refuse to appear before the
tribunal of the Bishop of Rome, when cited, shall be constrained to
appear by the governor of the province." It is a well-known fact that
Pope Gregory VII (1073-1085) made the declaration that the papal
power was superior to that of the emperor, so that Henry IV was
obliged to do penance at Oanossa, in January, 1077. And it is just
as generally known that the Popes since his time have never given up
their claims to earthly power and dominion, many of their demands
being based upon the Pseudo-Isidorian Decretals, and that the present
papal state is just a logical culmination of developments consistent
with the claims of the papal hierarchyo
8. The doctrine of Romanism apparently lays great stress on the
three Ecumenical Oreeds - the Apostolicum, the Kicellum, and the
Quicunq11e, so that the confession of the Father and of the Son seems
to be safeguarded. But a confession of the lips which seemingly
agrees to the Biblical statements concerning the Persons of the God-
head, but takes away from these very same Persons the divine works
and the peculiar honor demanded by Scripture, is a hollow mockery.
God the Father can be approached, even understood, only in and
through the Son. Every organization, therefore, that takes from the
Son any part of the honor demanded by the Bible, is antichristian in
character. The case against Romanism is well put in a recent book:
"One great aim, if not the chief aim, of the enemy of God in
propagating the Romish heresy (which is what we take to be 'the
depths of Satan') is to degrade the Lord Jesus Ohrist from His place
as the Son of God; for it is under that title that He is presented to
men: 1. as the Oreator and Heir of all things (Matt. 11,27; 001. 1,
13-16; Heb.l, 1-3); 2. as the only Way of Access to the Father
(John 14, 6; Eph. 2,18); 3. as the only Source and Giver of life to
perishing men and hence the only Savior (John 5,21. 24--26; 1 John
5, 12); and 4. as the One who has brought to mankind the nnal and
complete message or Word of God (Heb.l,2; Rev. 22,18. 19).-
In direct opposition to each of these features of revealed truth con-
cerning the 'Son of God,' though the opposition is indeed disguised
(so far as possible) with diabolical cleverness, the Romish hierarchy
systematieally present Jesus Ohrist, not as the Son of God, but as the
Son of :Mary. In all its doctrine, in all its ceremonies, in all its
liturgy and hooks of devotion, in all its pictures and images, and in
all its literature the false Ohurch of Rome, with most consummate
and satanic craft and with most deadly purpose, exalts Mary, making
her the compassionate one, the efficacious intercessor on behalf of
sinners, the real mediator between God and men, and exhibits Ohrist
in a position of subordination, the effect being, of course, that the
"Pap am Esse Ipsum Verum Alltichristum." 431
millions who are thus deluded and blinded by 'the god of this world'
me led to put their trust in Mary instead of in Jesus Christ, the
Son of God. It does not in the least affect the truth of what we are
now setting forth that in Romish formularies the words of Scripture
are often used and that Christ is often referred to therein by His
Scriptural titles; for all that is but a part, and a most effective part,
of the scheme of deception. The devil knows the Scripture, and he
knows how to quote it to his own ends, and he Imows also how to mix
in with the pure meal the deadly poison of his own doctrine. N ot-
withstanding, therefore, the orthodoxy of creeds and formnlaries, the
maintenance professedly of the doctrine of the Trinity (though truly
it is denied in practise), and all that, the Christ of Romanism is
',mother Jesus.'" (Mauro, Of the Things Which Soon JJlust Come
to Pass, 107 f.)
9. The presumption of Romanism in the field of liturgics and the
outward forms of worship was apparent almost from the beginning.
Although every bit of historical evidence denies the primacy of Peter,
and in particular the alleged twenty-five years of his Roman bishopric,
and although there is no evidence for the so-called Petrine Liturgy as
being the product of Peter's studies, yet all other liturgies were
eliminated in the course of the centuries (the Ephesine-Gallican, as
continued in the early British and the Irish, the Mozarabic, and
others), so that only parts of these ancient forms are permitted upon
occasion, while the Roman Liturgy has been forced upon all Roman
Oatholic chuTl,hes throughout the world. This means that the abomi-
nation of the Mass, the adoration of a small piece of bread, and
similar idolatrous customs are found wherever the Roman Ohurch has
been established.
10. The Church of Antichrist is intimately connected with vari-
OllS lying wonders, the greatest of which is the alleged miracle of the
Mass, where the blessing of the priest is supposed to effect the tran-
substantiation of the bread into the physical body and of the wine
into the physical blood of Christ. The doctrine of the :.vrass is one
of the most ingenious and pernicious inventions ever foisted upon
a church-body, and yet it is believed by millions of deluded people.
The same holds true of the miracles connected with alleged visions
of the Virgin JliIary, as at Lourdes in France, and those associated
with supposed relics of saints. That apparent or real results are
often achieved cannot be doubted, but even less can the word of the
Lord in Deut.13, 1-5 be doubted.
11. The deceptions practised by Romanism in the field of doctrine
are by no means confined to the doctrine of the ::'Ylass, the primacy of
Peter, and the denial in fact of the Son and the Father; no, there
is hardly a fundamental doctrine of Christianity left which has not
been contaminated, especially since the Council of Trent. The matter
has actually reached the stage where it is a difficult thing for many
members of the Roman Catholic Church to hear enough of the truth
concerning their salvation that they may know the way to heaven.
12. As to the last point, that is still in the future. But according
to present indications there is little prospect of changing the Roman
Church, since it is evidently intrenched as firmly as ever. The situa-
tion is aggravated by the fact that only a relatively small number of
churches at this time have the courage to point to the collective
person of the Roman Pope as the Antichrist and that even in certain
432 "Papam Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum."
parts of the Lutheran Ohurch a dubious attitude is taken concerning
the question. "If the trumpet give an uncertain sound, who shall
prepare himself to the battle?" 1 001'. 14, 8.
But a number of objections are raised to the identification which
is here advocated on the basis of our Lutheran Oonfessions. It is
held by various commentators and theologians that the Antichrist
must be regarded as an individual per·son or that he must be looked
for in some of the present antireligious movements or that he must
be expected at some time in the future, in connection with the signs
inaugurating the Last Day. Let us examine these objections some-
what more closely.
In the first place, the text in 2 Thess. 2, 6. 7 indicates that the
restraining power which held back the development of the Antichrist
is referred to by means of a masculine form, v. 7, and of a neuter
form, v. 6, that, therefore, the revelation of Antichrist also extended
over some length of time in the history of the Roman Empire. The
whole passage clearly speaks of historical developments, which cannot
be associated with only one individual, neither on the one side (that
of the Roman Empire) nor on the other (that of the son of perdition
in the midst of the Ohurch). This is further supported by the
prophecies concerning the Antichrist in the Book of Daniel. The pas-
sage in Dan. 8, 23 fl. is very much like the eschatological sayings of
Jesus, in which incidents near at hand and such centuries in the
future are placed side by side, and in part even interwoven. Antiochus
Epiphanes, who is referred to at the beginning of the passage, is
rightly regarded in history as a type of the .Antichrist of the New
Testament. Op. Dan. 9,26.27; 11,36 fl.
As for the second objection, that the Antichrist must be identified
with some of the present-day antichristian movements, such as
Modernism and Bolshevism, the contention will not stand in view
of the description given in the passages explained above. Although
Modernism arose within the Ohurch and is decidedly and glaringly
antichristian in character, it lacks some of the specific points which
are associated with the Antichrist, and it has no one exponent who
might be regarded as the collective head. Mohammedanism and
Bolshevism are both excluded since they originated outside of the
Ohurch. The fmmer is spoken of in Rev. 9, 17 fl., and the latter may
be included in the forces of Gog and Magog, Rev. 20, 8. 9.
As for the third objection, which would place the rise of Anti-
christ into the future, this is clearly ruled out by several passages in
the Book of Daniel and in the Book of Revelation. For although these
books are prophetical books, the explanations interspersed in the
prophetical sections almost compel the reader to draw certain con-
clusions as to the outward form and character as well as to the time
of the beginning of Antichrist's kingdom. In Dan. 11, 36 fl. the
"Pap am Esse lpsum Verum Antichristum." 433
description begins with that of Antiochus Epiphanes, but it is ex-
panded almost immediately to include the Antichrist. This is ap-
parent particularly in vv.44 and 45. The tidings out of the East
which troubled the Antichrist were those which set fOl'th the extent
of the Oriental secession, and the tidings out of the N Ol'th were those
of the Lutheran Reformation. On account of these tidings, espe-
cially the latter, the Antichrist went out with great fury to destroy,
and utterly to make away with, many, namely, in the Oounter-
Reformation and in the Il1quisition as instigated by the Jesuits. The
last words of the chapter are especially significant, for according to
them the Antichrist was to plant his tabernacle, his palace, between
the seas, over against the mountain of the ornament of holiness, so
that his palace was intended as a riyal of the ancient seat of J ehoyah'8
power in the midst of His holy people. It should be noted also that
tIle tabernacle of the Antichrist is located between seas, just as the
text sta tos.
But we must here include also the passages from the Book of
Revelation, especially chap. 13, 11 fl.; 17,:3 fl., particularly vv. 11
and 18; 18, 1 fl. 1£ ~we summarize all the points concerning the great
empires and then make a comparison concerning the last two, it is
clear that "the beast that was and is not, even he is the eighth, and
is of the seven, and goeth into perdition," is the Antichrist, the col-
lective head of the Roman system. "The seven heads arc seven
mountains, where the woman sits on them." The city of seven hills
is Rome, and therefore this reference to the Ohurch of the Antichrist,
to the Ohurch of Rome, is clear. In this entire paragraph, chap. 17,
9-14, the Roman Empire is conceived of as the continuation of the
ancient world empires, of which five have fallen, the Egyptian, the
Assyrian, the Babylonian, the Persian, and the Greek-Macedonian.
At the time when John wrote, the Roman Empire was in power.
And as for the seventh ruler and empire, that is undoubtedly to be
found in the Ohristianized Roman Empire, in the kingdom of the
Antichrist. The papal state indeed was and is not of great extent,
but the dominion of the Pope during the thousand and more years of
his kingdom reached far beyond the boundaries of his province, and
his influence and authority are still evident in the life of the nations.
'Ve quote once more from Mauro (p. 399 fl., passim): "Here is in-
formation which we should clearly fix in our minds, namely, 1) that
tho Roman EmpiTe, under which John was liying when he wrote this
description, was the sixth in the succession of seven Gentile kingdoms
and 2) that another was to fo]low, which should be the last and which
would have but a short term of existence." liYho is not constrained
to think here at once of the end of the old Roman Empire, of the
rise of the Papacy, and of the Holy Roman Empire of the German
N atiol1? There is a succession indeed, but there is also a continua-
28
434 "Pap am Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum."
tion; there is a restriction at times of temporal, physical power and
authority, but there is authority and power nevertheless. But to
continue our quotation: "Romanism did arise during the course of
the existence of the Roman Empire; it is a system of religious char-
acter and political aim; and it has been, from the beginning, closely
identified with the nations comprising the Roman Empire. . .. The
Roman Empire itself arose out of the tumultuous and restless sea
of the multitudinous nations, whereas the Papacy, as a political
system, arose out of the stabilized part of the world, in fact, in the
very heart of the Roman Empire itself. So closely have they been
identified from the beginning that the capital city of the empire has
been also the seat of the Papacy. . .. Behold, then, the three great
actors in the last drama of earth's history: 1) the dragon, the real
potency behind it all, though invisible; 2) the beast, the Roman
Empire, still existing in its iron framework of civil government and
now in process of assuming its final ten-horned form; and 3) the
Papacy with its vast organization, its millions of blinded and super-
stitious devotees, and its steadfast political aim!"
If this short summary of the Scriptural facts concerning the
Antichrist as compared with known historical data does not yet carry
conviction to some one who may feel reluctant about risking the final
identification of the Antichrist as the collective head of Romanism,
as the representative person of this amazing system of antichristianism,
a further detailed study of all the passages referred to, especially with
the aid of Luther, is strongly reco=ended.. (See, for example, his
tract against Ambrosius Oatharinus in Vol. XVIII, 1434 iI. of the
St. Louis Edition.) For we must always remember that Luther was
not at first biased against Romanism, but that he was until 1517,
and even later, a strong protagonist of the system. Op. his co=ents
on 1 John 4, 1 iI.
But as for Lutheran theologians, doubt or hesitation is hardly
excusable, since our Oonfessions make such clear statements concern-
ing the Antichrist that the issue is clear-cut. We quote, first, from
the Smalcald Articles: "This teaching shows forcefully that the Pope
is the very Antichrist, who has exalted himself above, and opposed
himself against, Ohrist, because he will not permit Ohristians to be
saved without his power, which, nevertheless, is nothing and is neither
ordained nor commanded by God. This is, properly speaking, to exalt
himself above all that is ealled God, as Paul says, 2 Thess. 2, 4 ....
Therefore, just as little as we can worship the devil himself as Lord
and God, we can endure his apostle, the Pope, or Antichrist, in his
rule as head and lord." (Gone. Trigl., 475, §§ 10.11.14.) The last
statement is incorporated in the Formula of Ooncord, 1059, § 20. We
quote further from the Smalcald Articles: "Now, it is manifest that
"Papam Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum." 435
the Roman pontiffs, with their adherents, defend [and practise] god-
less doctrines an d godless services. And the marks [all the vices]
of Antichrist plainly agree with the kingdom of the Pope and his
adherents. For Paul, 2. Ep. 2, 3, in describing to the Thessalonians
Antichrist, calls him an adversary of Christ. . .. This being the case,
all Ohristians ought to beware of becoming partakers of the godless
doctrine, blasphemies, and unjust cruelty of the Pope. On this ac-
count they ought to desert and execrate the Pope with his adherents
as the kingdom of Anticill:ist, just as Ohrist has commanded, Matt.
7, 15: Beware of false prophets. . .. Even though the Bishop of
Rome had the primacy by divine right, yet, since he defends godless
services and doctrine conflicting with the Gospel, obedience is not
due him; yea, it is necessary to resist him as Antichrist. The errors
of the Pope are manifest and not trifling." (Lac. cit., 515, § 39;
517, § 41b; 521, § 57.) Other important passages which belong here
are 499, § 11; 469, § 25; 417, § 98.
The doctrine of the Antichrist is well summarized by two recent
teachers of the Lutheran Ohurch. Hoenecke (Ev.-Luth. Dogmati7c,
IV, 219 ff.) first lists the characteristic features of Antichrist: origi-
nating in the midst of the Ohurch, coming after the working of
Satan, described as a collective person, having his t111'one in the midst
of the Ohurch of God, coming forward after the removal of the
restraining power, and then applies these features to the Papacy. He
even makes the following sharp remark: "Wir sprechcn dem, eZeT diesen
Artikcl nicht glaubt, eZie Seligkeit nicht ab, wahl abel' die lntherische
Kirchengemeinschaft." - Pieper (Ohristl. Dogmatik, III, 527-534)
speaks in a similar strain, giving as the characteristics of Antichrist:
apostasy, sitting in the midst of the Ohurch, pretending that he is
God, active by the working Satan, remaining to the Last Day. This
he applies to the system of Romanism headed by the Pope as a repre-
sentative person, closing with the words: "J eeZer Lehrer in der
christZichen K irche ist schwach in del' Thcologie, del', obwohZ er mit
del' historischcn E1'scheinung eZes Papstes be7cannt ist, im Papsttum
nicht eZen 2 Thcss. 2 geweissagten Antichrist e1'kennt."
If we value the pure, the saving doctrine of the vicarious atone-
ment through the blood of Jesus Ohrist, the God-man, in these latter
days of the world, we shall do well to keep these facts concerning the
Antichrist in mind, so that we may give heed to the prayer of Luther:
"lmpleat vas Deus oeZio papae," the hatred being indeed not directed
against him as an individual, but against him as the representative
of the system of Romanism, as the collective head uf an organization
of such a pernicious nature that he, and he alone, is rightly called
the Antichrist. P. E. KRETZMANN.