Full Text for Papam Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum (Text)
 er die Scbafe ull terweise. wi. 
5ie rfcbte Cbri,ten sollen soin. sondern 
auch dnnebcn den Woollen w.hr .... dass 
ie die Scbafo nicbt angrelfen und mit 
fnIscher Lohre verfuehren und Irrtum ein· 
fllehren. - Luther. 
Es i,t kein Ding. das die Leute mebr 
bei der Kirche behaelt denn die gute 
Predigt. - Apo/Ollie. Art. 2.+. 
II the trumpet give an uncertain Bound. 
who 'hall prepare himself to tbe battle! 
1 Cor. L+. 8. 
Published for the 
E v. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States 
CONCORDIA PU:BLISHI NG HOUSE, St. Louis, Mo. 
424 "Papam Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum." 
mortHdj finb fitr aUe ~oirrungen, audj aUf bern ®ebie± ber 2efjre, nidjt 
nur in ifjrer eigenen @cmeinbe, fonbern aud) in ber Sl:ird)engemeinfd)aft, 
3U ber fie \clefjoren: ~ofj. 10, 5 (,,(Einem ~remben aoer f 0 f 9 en fie 
n i d) t n a cfj; benn fie fennen ber ~remben €±tmme nidjt"), 1 ~ofj. 4, 1 
(,,~fjr 2ieoen, glaubet nidjt einem jegHdjen ®eift, fonbern p r u f et 
bie @eifter, ob fie bon @ot± finb"); 2 ~ofj.l0 (,,€o jemanb au 
eudj fommt unb b ri n 9 t b i e f e 2 e fj r e n i d) t, ben n e fj m et 
n i dj ± in § &;;l au § unb grutei ifjn audj nidjt"). 2Iudj ben 2aiew 
gHebern mut bafjer gegebenenfaU§ 3um ?EcltlU13tf ein georadj± il1crben, 
bat fie fid) im falf d)en 2ager oefinben unb barum Ieid)t fidj frember 
€unben teiIfjaftig mad)en fLinnen: ®aL 3,1 (">mer fjat cud) beaaubed, 
bat ifjr ber >mafjrfjeit nidjt gefjordjet?"), @aL 5, £) (,,(Einmenig €auer~ 
teig berf iiued ben ganaen ~eig"). 
~pologie, 242, § 48: ,,~od) foU man faIfdje 2efjtet nidjt 
an n e fj men ober fjoren; benn biefcIoigen finb nidjt mefjr an C£fjtiftu§' 
€tait, fonbern finb >miberdjrifti." 
€d)maUafbifdje ~rmeI, 518, § 52: ,,~arum foUen gotte§furd)±ige 
2eute fold)e gteuHdje ~rrllimer be§ ~apf±cs unb feine ~t)rannei mofjI 
oebenren unb aum erfien mifjen, bat fofdjc;s r r± u mer all fI i e fj en 
unb bie rcdjte 2efjre ber 0:fjre ®otie§ unb ber €eeIen €efigfeit fjaIDen 
an3unefjmen fei." 
€djmaIfalbifdje 2frtifeI, 520, § 58: ,,€o ftefji ®oite§ mefefjI unb 
>mort ba, bat mit ~ogottetei, f a If d) e 2 e fj t e unb unbiUige >muterer 
ff i e fj en f 0 II en. " 
€djmaIl'albifd)e 2frtil'eI, 524, § 72: ,,~enn fo geoietet \l5aulu§, 
bat ane ?EifdJofe, 10 enthJeber f e 16 ft un r e di i Ie fj r en ober II n ~ 
ted) i e 2 e fj t e unb fali dien ®ottesbienf± bert e i big en, fut 
ft t ii f rid) e 2 e ute fonen gefjaIten merben." 
@roBer Sl:atedii§muB, 572, § 17: ,,~enn baB mut ja fein, lner 
bie 8efjn ®eoo±e hJofjI unb gar Tann, bat ber mut bie ganae €djrif± 
l'onnen, bat et fonlle in aUen €ad)en unb ~iiUen w±en, fjeIfen, ±toften, 
m±eHen, tidi±en beibe geiftridj unb hJeItridi >mefen unb moge fein e i n 
mid) ± e r u 0 era r I e 2 e fj t e, €±iinbe, @eiftet, medite, UnD ma§ in 
ber >md± fein mag." ~. (E. Sftetmann. 
4 II ~ 
ill ESSE :psum Verum .L·~ntichristt1m." 
"Haee. doctrina praeelare ostenclit papam esse ips~Lm verum anti-
e711'istum, qtti supm et contra Chrishlm sese extuZit." "This teaching 
shows forcefully that the Pope is the very Antichrist, who has exalted 
himself above, and oP1Josod himself ag8inst, Christ, because he will 
not p~rmit Christians to be saved without his power, which, never-
theless, is nothing and is neither ordained llOT co=anded by God." 
(Smalcald Articles, Part II, Art. IV, Cone. TrigZ., 474f.) There is 
nothing uncertain or ambiguous about this statement, and it will be 
well for us to set forth, chiefly on the basis of Scripture, but with 
certain digressions also into the field of history, just why we firmly 
hold to the declaration given in the caption of this article. 
"Papam Esse Ipsum Verum Antichdstum." 425 
'iVhat are the characteristics of antichristianism, and what dis-
tinction does Holy Scripture make between antichrists in general and 
the one Antichrist %a,' :!I;oX1)V in particular? The answer to this double 
question can best be given 011 the basis of several passages in the 
epistles of J olm. In 1 J olm 2, 18 we read: "Little children, the last 
hom· it is; and just as you heard that Antichrist is coming, even now 
many antichrists lwve come into existence, whence we recognize that 
it is the last hour." In 1 J olm 4, 1 we are told: "Beloved, do not 
yield belief to every spirit, but test the spirits whether they are of 
God, for many ll5MbcZOllT'ophets have gone out into the world." And 
in 2 J olm 7: "For many deceiveTs have been going out into the world, 
such as do not make the confession of Jesus Ohrist as coming in the 
flesh." It is clear from these three passages that antichristianism 
is represented, in general, by men who are false prophets or deceivers, 
to whom the Holy Ghost applies the specific name "antichrists," the 
word itself indicating an atmosphere of rivalry, giving color to 
hostility. Antichristianism is in its very nature a phenomenon of 
this present a low, of the world, that which will find its end and 
culmination on the Day of Judgment. It is not an external POW8l' 
arising against the Ohristian Ohurch and the Ohristian faith, but it 
is a movement represented by many deceivers or false prophets who 
have fallen away from the tTuth while still outwardly connected with 
the Ohurch, so that it was only their going out (v. 19) which made 
them known as no longer belonging to the Ohurch. They arise, they 
come into existence, within the Ohurch, and then the sepm·ation takes 
place. It is not stated that this separation means a physical removal, 
for unfortunately in many instances the false teachers pervert whole 
congregations and thus remain in their positions of honor and in-
fluence. The e~l(}XBG1'}at is further explained by the 9'aVB(}Ova{}at; for 
it is the revealing of their antichristian teaching on the part of the 
faithful teachers that is equivalent to their removal from the ranks 
of the orthodox believers. The serious aspect of antichristianism is 
brought out by the words of the apostle, which characterize their 
false teaching not as a mere aberration in a minor point of doctrine, 
but as a refusal to make confession of Jesus Ohrist as coming in the 
flesh. In other words, antichristianism subverts the doctrines of 
christology and soteriology, the whole basis of objective justification 
as taught in Holy Writ, thereby destroying the fundamental facts of 
salvation. 
It is evident that antichristianism was not confined to Gnosticism, 
Manichaeism, or any other of the early heresies which subverted the 
truth of the objective salvation and justification, but is found through-
out this last aeon of the world wherever and whenever teachers of this 
type arise in the Ohurch. There have been antichrists in every period 
of the Ohurch's history. The Apostolic Age had its Judaizing 
426 "Pap am Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum." 
teachers, the subapostolic age its Gnostics, the period immediately 
preceding Nicaea the heresies enumerated by Ireneaus, the period 
following Nicaea the Arians, the period of the later ecumenical 
councils it.s N estorians, Monophysites, and Monothelites, the later 
Middle Ages the Bogomiles, the Oathari, the Albigenses, and the 
Petro-Brussians, the period since the Reformation the great mass of 
anti-Trinitarian and antichristian sects whose false doctrines have 
culminated in the theology of the social gospel and in Modernism. 
But Holy Scripture speaks not only of antichrists and pseudo-
prophets of this kind. In a very emphat.ic manner the Ohristians of 
all times are warned against one great Antichrist, a phenomenon in 
history which is unique in almost every respect. The three passages 
in John's epistles from which we have quoted make a very clear 
distinction between antichristianism as represented by the minor 
antichrists and the one Antichrist xar' S~Ox~Y, even though the latter 
is described as possessing some of the characteristics of the former. 
1 John 2, 18 expressly states: "Antichrist is coming," the absence of 
the article giving the subject the force of a propel' noun. 1 John 2, 22 
dedllres: "This is the Anticluist, who den£es the Father and the 
Son." In 1 John4,3 we read: "And every spirit that does not con-
fess Jesus is not of God; and this is that of the Antichrist, who, as 
you have heard, is corning and now is a,lready in the wo1'ld." Here 
we must again add 2 John 7b: "This is the deceiver and the Anti-
christ." 
The characteristics of the Antichrist as given by the Apostle John 
are the following: He has the spirit that does not confess Jesus; he 
denies the Father and the Son; and he is a deceiver. Of this Anti-
christ it is said that he both is coming and that he is already in the 
world. In other words, he represented a power which was even then 
in existence, but was also in process of coming, and the most dis-
tinguishing feature of his character is given as the denial of the 
Father and of the Son, specifically of Jesus. 
The Apostle John, in 1 John 4, 3, refers to the fact that his 
readers had heard of the coming of the Antichrist, and there can be 
no doubt that he intends to have them recall what they had heard from 
the Apostle Paul, particularly in the latter's exposition in 2 Thess. 2, 
3-12. The points which are enumerated in this loct~s classic~~s on the 
doctrine of the Antichrist are t.he following. The apostle speakR, v. 3, 
of the apostasy, of the falling away from the truth, a denial therefore 
of such large proportions that it is particularly designated with the 
specific article. Not only was this apostasy to precede the coming of 
the Last Day, but also the re1Jealing of the man of lawlessness, a man 
who would be characterized by his rebellion against the Law of God, 
against the revealed truth and will. This person is then called the 
son of perdition. As he peculiarly belongs to sin, is the representative 
"Papam Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum." 427 
of sin, its personification, so he is the son of eternal condemnation and 
destruction, one who is destined to eternal damnation on account of 
his rebellion. - It is further said of the Antichrist that he sets him-
self, and vaunts himself above, all that is called God 01' an object of 
worship, so that he sets himself into the temple of God, showing him-
self forth that he is God. Scripture ascribes the title god not only to 
the one true God, who is above all, but also to the principalities and 
powers of heaven (Ps. 9'7, '7, cpo with Heb. 1, 6) as well as to rulers on 
earth, who govern as the higher powers ordained by God (Ps. 82, 1. 6, 
cpo with John 10, 34; Ex. 22,28). Above all these, yea, above the one 
true God, who alone bears the title with full right, the Antichrist 
would exalt and vaunt himself. He would do the same with regard 
to every r1s{Jar1p-a, every object and every form of worship. So great 
would this pride and usurpation finally become that the Antichrist 
would even presume to occupy the temple of God and to exercise the 
prerogatives of God. It is significant that present participles are used 
throughout this verse, indicating the enduring nature of the phenom-
enon, and that the temple of God is referred to, evidently not one 
built of wood or stone, but a spiritual structure, as frequently in the 
New Testament. Op.l Oor. 3, 16.11. 
The description continues in v. 6: And now you know what with-
holds that he may be revealed in his own time. At the time when 
the Apostle Paul was writing to the Thessalonians there was still 
something, some power, some hindrance, which was restraining the 
Antichrist from being revealed before his appointed time. The 
restraint was in keeping with the purpose of God, for it was His in-
tention to make known, to expose, the Antichrist at the time ap-
pointed by Him. - The apostle next explains why and in what sense 
he speaks of a revealing of the man of lawlessness: For the mystery 
of lawlessness is active even now, only until he who restrains for the 
present is out of the way. The apostle saw before him the scattered, 
shapeless mass of ungodliness, of lawlessness, which was to gain form 
and personality in the Antichrist. The movement which later cul-
minated in the reign of the Antichrist was at that time still hidden 
and covered; it had not yet come out into the open; one could not 
as yet point out specific instances of its destructive power. It was 
indeed at work; it was active in certain phenomena and develop-
ments, in certain usurpations of power, in certain tyrannical excres-
cences instigated by unruly spirits. Against a clear and unmistakable 
manifestation of power, however, another force was at that time active, 
one which made it impossible for the lawlessness of the Antichrist to 
carry out his design. The 0 uarsxrov is clearly not an individual 
person, but a representative of a power (TO uadxov) whose activityex-
tended over some time. In the same way the mystery of iniquity is 
spoken of as a person, for the mystery of lawlessness finally found 
its culmination in the Lawless One. 
428 "Pap am Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum." 
This is spoken of in v. 8: And then the Lawless One shall be 
revealed, whom the LMd Jesgs shall consume with the breath of His 
mouth, and He shall make an end of him by the appearing of His 
coming. Here both the revelation and the final disposition of the 
Antichrist are included in one short statement. Then, or at that time, 
namely, when the restriction shall have been removed which was still 
interfering with the open execution of the allollJa, then the proud 
one, the Lawless One, would appear before the eyes of the world with-
out any cloak or covering. Throughout the last aeon of the world 
the Lawless One would then be active, until the Lord would bring 
upon him his final destiny, namely, in His great pa1'01lsia, when He 
would destroy, or consume, him with the breath of His mouth.-
Meanwhile, however, the Anticl1l'ist would continue his nefarious ac-
tivity: Whose coming is after the working of Satan in all power and 
signs and lying miracles and in all deceitfulness of 1mrighteotLsness 
to them that are lost, because they did not accept the love of the truth 
that they might be saved, vv. 9. 10. So the man of lawlessness, or 
wickedness, was to derive his power, or energy, from Satan, and the 
strength that he was to wield would be that of a lie, just as the: signs 
and wonders would be products of lies and frauds. At the same time 
he would continue in all deceit of unrighteousness, having a glittering 
show of righteousness and holiness, with good works, pomp, and show 
flaunted before the eyes of the world at all times, so that his influence 
and power would have results among those who would be perishing, 
for nIl those who would actually support the system, with a knowledge 
of its falsehood, would thereby forfeit their claim to salvation. 
On account of their perversity, as a just recompense for their 
refusal to accept the truth, the Lord would give the adherents of the 
Antichrist up to their obduration: And for this reason Gael sends 
them w01'king of delusion that they should believe the falsehood, that 
all might be judged who did not believe the truth, but had pleasure in 
umighteousness. God would punish all those who would be deliber-
ately disobedient by giving them up to the lie which they would choose 
by preference. A power, or strength, of deception would enter their 
hearts until they would refuse to return to the truth, since a devilish 
perversion would take hold of them. And the end would be the con-
demnation of the Lord. Such is a brief exposition of the words of 
the apostle in 2 Thess. 2. 
If we now take the points given in the passages from J olm's 
epistles and those contained in 2 Thess. 2, we have the following list: 
1. The Antichrist is not any particular individual, but a represen-
tative perSOll, or a power represented by a person or in a verdon. 
2. He was in process of coming', or development, as early as the 
middle of the first century, when the mystery of lawlessness was 
already at work. 
"Papam Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum." 429 
3. He is not an outside person or power, but arose in the midst 
of the Ohurch, in the temple of God. 
4. The revelation of his lawlessness was hindered by a power 
headed by a restraining person. 
5. After the removal of this hindering influence the Antichrist 
came out openly with his claims and was also revealed in his true 
nature. 
6. He was exposed before the world, but continued his activity 
as the son of perdition. 
7. He claims divine prerogatives for himself, vaunting himself 
and raising himself above constituted authorities. 
8. His doctrine is, in its last analysis, a denial of the :Father 
and of the Son as revealed in both their persons and their work in 
the Holy Scriptures. 
9. He presumes to direct eyery object and every form of 
worship. 
10. He operates with lying wonders, that is, such as are based 
upon lies and intended to spread lies. 
11. He is constantly deceiving people who give credence to his 
false claims. 
12. He will not be destroyed until the Lord's great parousia. 
It is surely a h8avy and scathing arraignment that ~W8 have 
before us. IVe ask at once: To which historical phenomenon must 
we apply the description 1 ~We answer without hesitation, on the basis 
of the evidence which can easily be adduced, that the passages briefly 
explained above apply to the Pope of Rome, with his whole system, 
with his entire pernicious activity. Every statement applies with 
unmistakable force. 
1. Romanislll is a system personified in its head, who is thus 
a representative person. IVe do not single out any particular in-
dividual' although some Popes were in their own persons more repre-
sentatiye of the system than others. Every new Pope simply inherits 
the system and is the exponent of the system, quite frequently also its 
spokesman. 
2. The movement which culminated in the papal system had its 
origin about the year 50 A. D., when the first indications of a hier-
archy with more or less evident powers began to appear. Passages 
like Acts 20, 30 are prophetical as well as descriptive. 
3. Romanism arose in the very midst of the Ohurch of Jesus 
Ohrist, its very bishops being the ones who fostered the idea by their 
hierarchical aspimtions and their gradual assumption of more powero 
4. As long as the Roman EmpiTe, with the emperor at its head, 
was in power, the Ohristian Ohurch not being a religio licita, the 
aspirations of the hierarchy could not come to fruition. 
5. When the Ohristian religion, at the time of Oonstantine, be-
came the state religion, the outward organization of the Ohurch could 
be built up without hindrance, and this factor became still mOTe 
prominent with the energetic efforts of Leo I to establish the tlu·one 
of the Papacy. The end of the Western Empire (476 A. D.) was 
merely an additional factor in the rise of the Papacy. From the end 
of the fifth century onward the true character of the Papacy was re-
vealed more and more. 
430 "Pap am Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum." 
6. The Antichrist was exposed by Luther and was so recognized 
at the time of the Reformation; but he l'ecovered from the blow, due 
chiefly to the divisions in the Protestant ranks and the Jesuit Oounter-
Reformation, so that he has continued his pernicious activities to 
this day. 
7. As early as the year 445 A. D. Valentini an III, a monarch con-
trolled by Pope Leo I, passed this celebrated decree: "The primacy of 
the Apostolic See having been established by the merit of St. Peter, 
its founder, the sacred Oouncil of Nice, and the dignity of the city 
of Rome, we thus declare our irrevocable edict that all bishops, 
whether in Gaul or elsewhere, shall make no innovation without the 
salwtion of the Bishop of Rome; and, that the Apostolic See may 
remain inviolable, all bishops who shall refuse to appear before the 
tribunal of the Bishop of Rome, when cited, shall be constrained to 
appear by the governor of the province." It is a well-known fact that 
Pope Gregory VII (1073-1085) made the declaration that the papal 
power was superior to that of the emperor, so that Henry IV was 
obliged to do penance at Oanossa, in January, 1077. And it is just 
as generally known that the Popes since his time have never given up 
their claims to earthly power and dominion, many of their demands 
being based upon the Pseudo-Isidorian Decretals, and that the present 
papal state is just a logical culmination of developments consistent 
with the claims of the papal hierarchyo 
8. The doctrine of Romanism apparently lays great stress on the 
three Ecumenical Oreeds - the Apostolicum, the Kicellum, and the 
Quicunq11e, so that the confession of the Father and of the Son seems 
to be safeguarded. But a confession of the lips which seemingly 
agrees to the Biblical statements concerning the Persons of the God-
head, but takes away from these very same Persons the divine works 
and the peculiar honor demanded by Scripture, is a hollow mockery. 
God the Father can be approached, even understood, only in and 
through the Son. Every organization, therefore, that takes from the 
Son any part of the honor demanded by the Bible, is antichristian in 
character. The case against Romanism is well put in a recent book: 
"One great aim, if not the chief aim, of the enemy of God in 
propagating the Romish heresy (which is what we take to be 'the 
depths of Satan') is to degrade the Lord Jesus Ohrist from His place 
as the Son of God; for it is under that title that He is presented to 
men: 1. as the Oreator and Heir of all things (Matt. 11,27; 001. 1, 
13-16; Heb.l, 1-3); 2. as the only Way of Access to the Father 
(John 14, 6; Eph. 2,18); 3. as the only Source and Giver of life to 
perishing men and hence the only Savior (John 5,21. 24--26; 1 John 
5, 12); and 4. as the One who has brought to mankind the nnal and 
complete message or Word of God (Heb.l,2; Rev. 22,18. 19).-
In direct opposition to each of these features of revealed truth con-
cerning the 'Son of God,' though the opposition is indeed disguised 
(so far as possible) with diabolical cleverness, the Romish hierarchy 
systematieally present Jesus Ohrist, not as the Son of God, but as the 
Son of :Mary. In all its doctrine, in all its ceremonies, in all its 
liturgy and hooks of devotion, in all its pictures and images, and in 
all its literature the false Ohurch of Rome, with most consummate 
and satanic craft and with most deadly purpose, exalts Mary, making 
her the compassionate one, the efficacious intercessor on behalf of 
sinners, the real mediator between God and men, and exhibits Ohrist 
in a position of subordination, the effect being, of course, that the 
"Pap am Esse Ipsum Verum Alltichristum." 431 
millions who are thus deluded and blinded by 'the god of this world' 
me led to put their trust in Mary instead of in Jesus Christ, the 
Son of God. It does not in the least affect the truth of what we are 
now setting forth that in Romish formularies the words of Scripture 
are often used and that Christ is often referred to therein by His 
Scriptural titles; for all that is but a part, and a most effective part, 
of the scheme of deception. The devil knows the Scripture, and he 
knows how to quote it to his own ends, and he Imows also how to mix 
in with the pure meal the deadly poison of his own doctrine. N ot-
withstanding, therefore, the orthodoxy of creeds and formnlaries, the 
maintenance professedly of the doctrine of the Trinity (though truly 
it is denied in practise), and all that, the Christ of Romanism is 
',mother Jesus.'" (Mauro, Of the Things Which Soon JJlust Come 
to Pass, 107 f.) 
9. The presumption of Romanism in the field of liturgics and the 
outward forms of worship was apparent almost from the beginning. 
Although every bit of historical evidence denies the primacy of Peter, 
and in particular the alleged twenty-five years of his Roman bishopric, 
and although there is no evidence for the so-called Petrine Liturgy as 
being the product of Peter's studies, yet all other liturgies were 
eliminated in the course of the centuries (the Ephesine-Gallican, as 
continued in the early British and the Irish, the Mozarabic, and 
others), so that only parts of these ancient forms are permitted upon 
occasion, while the Roman Liturgy has been forced upon all Roman 
Oatholic chuTl,hes throughout the world. This means that the abomi-
nation of the Mass, the adoration of a small piece of bread, and 
similar idolatrous customs are found wherever the Roman Ohurch has 
been established. 
10. The Church of Antichrist is intimately connected with vari-
OllS lying wonders, the greatest of which is the alleged miracle of the 
Mass, where the blessing of the priest is supposed to effect the tran-
substantiation of the bread into the physical body and of the wine 
into the physical blood of Christ. The doctrine of the :.vrass is one 
of the most ingenious and pernicious inventions ever foisted upon 
a church-body, and yet it is believed by millions of deluded people. 
The same holds true of the miracles connected with alleged visions 
of the Virgin JliIary, as at Lourdes in France, and those associated 
with supposed relics of saints. That apparent or real results are 
often achieved cannot be doubted, but even less can the word of the 
Lord in Deut.13, 1-5 be doubted. 
11. The deceptions practised by Romanism in the field of doctrine 
are by no means confined to the doctrine of the ::'Ylass, the primacy of 
Peter, and the denial in fact of the Son and the Father; no, there 
is hardly a fundamental doctrine of Christianity left which has not 
been contaminated, especially since the Council of Trent. The matter 
has actually reached the stage where it is a difficult thing for many 
members of the Roman Catholic Church to hear enough of the truth 
concerning their salvation that they may know the way to heaven. 
12. As to the last point, that is still in the future. But according 
to present indications there is little prospect of changing the Roman 
Church, since it is evidently intrenched as firmly as ever. The situa-
tion is aggravated by the fact that only a relatively small number of 
churches at this time have the courage to point to the collective 
person of the Roman Pope as the Antichrist and that even in certain 
432 "Papam Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum." 
parts of the Lutheran Ohurch a dubious attitude is taken concerning 
the question. "If the trumpet give an uncertain sound, who shall 
prepare himself to the battle?" 1 001'. 14, 8. 
But a number of objections are raised to the identification which 
is here advocated on the basis of our Lutheran Oonfessions. It is 
held by various commentators and theologians that the Antichrist 
must be regarded as an individual per·son or that he must be looked 
for in some of the present antireligious movements or that he must 
be expected at some time in the future, in connection with the signs 
inaugurating the Last Day. Let us examine these objections some-
what more closely. 
In the first place, the text in 2 Thess. 2, 6. 7 indicates that the 
restraining power which held back the development of the Antichrist 
is referred to by means of a masculine form, v. 7, and of a neuter 
form, v. 6, that, therefore, the revelation of Antichrist also extended 
over some length of time in the history of the Roman Empire. The 
whole passage clearly speaks of historical developments, which cannot 
be associated with only one individual, neither on the one side (that 
of the Roman Empire) nor on the other (that of the son of perdition 
in the midst of the Ohurch). This is further supported by the 
prophecies concerning the Antichrist in the Book of Daniel. The pas-
sage in Dan. 8, 23 fl. is very much like the eschatological sayings of 
Jesus, in which incidents near at hand and such centuries in the 
future are placed side by side, and in part even interwoven. Antiochus 
Epiphanes, who is referred to at the beginning of the passage, is 
rightly regarded in history as a type of the .Antichrist of the New 
Testament. Op. Dan. 9,26.27; 11,36 fl. 
As for the second objection, that the Antichrist must be identified 
with some of the present-day antichristian movements, such as 
Modernism and Bolshevism, the contention will not stand in view 
of the description given in the passages explained above. Although 
Modernism arose within the Ohurch and is decidedly and glaringly 
antichristian in character, it lacks some of the specific points which 
are associated with the Antichrist, and it has no one exponent who 
might be regarded as the collective head. Mohammedanism and 
Bolshevism are both excluded since they originated outside of the 
Ohurch. The fmmer is spoken of in Rev. 9, 17 fl., and the latter may 
be included in the forces of Gog and Magog, Rev. 20, 8. 9. 
As for the third objection, which would place the rise of Anti-
christ into the future, this is clearly ruled out by several passages in 
the Book of Daniel and in the Book of Revelation. For although these 
books are prophetical books, the explanations interspersed in the 
prophetical sections almost compel the reader to draw certain con-
clusions as to the outward form and character as well as to the time 
of the beginning of Antichrist's kingdom. In Dan. 11, 36 fl. the 
"Pap am Esse lpsum Verum Antichristum." 433 
description begins with that of Antiochus Epiphanes, but it is ex-
panded almost immediately to include the Antichrist. This is ap-
parent particularly in vv.44 and 45. The tidings out of the East 
which troubled the Antichrist were those which set fOl'th the extent 
of the Oriental secession, and the tidings out of the N Ol'th were those 
of the Lutheran Reformation. On account of these tidings, espe-
cially the latter, the Antichrist went out with great fury to destroy, 
and utterly to make away with, many, namely, in the Oounter-
Reformation and in the Il1quisition as instigated by the Jesuits. The 
last words of the chapter are especially significant, for according to 
them the Antichrist was to plant his tabernacle, his palace, between 
the seas, over against the mountain of the ornament of holiness, so 
that his palace was intended as a riyal of the ancient seat of J ehoyah'8 
power in the midst of His holy people. It should be noted also that 
tIle tabernacle of the Antichrist is located between seas, just as the 
text sta tos. 
But we must here include also the passages from the Book of 
Revelation, especially chap. 13, 11 fl.; 17,:3 fl., particularly vv. 11 
and 18; 18, 1 fl. 1£ ~we summarize all the points concerning the great 
empires and then make a comparison concerning the last two, it is 
clear that "the beast that was and is not, even he is the eighth, and 
is of the seven, and goeth into perdition," is the Antichrist, the col-
lective head of the Roman system. "The seven heads arc seven 
mountains, where the woman sits on them." The city of seven hills 
is Rome, and therefore this reference to the Ohurch of the Antichrist, 
to the Ohurch of Rome, is clear. In this entire paragraph, chap. 17, 
9-14, the Roman Empire is conceived of as the continuation of the 
ancient world empires, of which five have fallen, the Egyptian, the 
Assyrian, the Babylonian, the Persian, and the Greek-Macedonian. 
At the time when John wrote, the Roman Empire was in power. 
And as for the seventh ruler and empire, that is undoubtedly to be 
found in the Ohristianized Roman Empire, in the kingdom of the 
Antichrist. The papal state indeed was and is not of great extent, 
but the dominion of the Pope during the thousand and more years of 
his kingdom reached far beyond the boundaries of his province, and 
his influence and authority are still evident in the life of the nations. 
'Ve quote once more from Mauro (p. 399 fl., passim): "Here is in-
formation which we should clearly fix in our minds, namely, 1) that 
tho Roman EmpiTe, under which John was liying when he wrote this 
description, was the sixth in the succession of seven Gentile kingdoms 
and 2) that another was to fo]low, which should be the last and which 
would have but a short term of existence." liYho is not constrained 
to think here at once of the end of the old Roman Empire, of the 
rise of the Papacy, and of the Holy Roman Empire of the German 
N atiol1? There is a succession indeed, but there is also a continua-
28 
434 "Pap am Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum." 
tion; there is a restriction at times of temporal, physical power and 
authority, but there is authority and power nevertheless. But to 
continue our quotation: "Romanism did arise during the course of 
the existence of the Roman Empire; it is a system of religious char-
acter and political aim; and it has been, from the beginning, closely 
identified with the nations comprising the Roman Empire. . .. The 
Roman Empire itself arose out of the tumultuous and restless sea 
of the multitudinous nations, whereas the Papacy, as a political 
system, arose out of the stabilized part of the world, in fact, in the 
very heart of the Roman Empire itself. So closely have they been 
identified from the beginning that the capital city of the empire has 
been also the seat of the Papacy. . .. Behold, then, the three great 
actors in the last drama of earth's history: 1) the dragon, the real 
potency behind it all, though invisible; 2) the beast, the Roman 
Empire, still existing in its iron framework of civil government and 
now in process of assuming its final ten-horned form; and 3) the 
Papacy with its vast organization, its millions of blinded and super-
stitious devotees, and its steadfast political aim!" 
If this short summary of the Scriptural facts concerning the 
Antichrist as compared with known historical data does not yet carry 
conviction to some one who may feel reluctant about risking the final 
identification of the Antichrist as the collective head of Romanism, 
as the representative person of this amazing system of antichristianism, 
a further detailed study of all the passages referred to, especially with 
the aid of Luther, is strongly reco=ended.. (See, for example, his 
tract against Ambrosius Oatharinus in Vol. XVIII, 1434 iI. of the 
St. Louis Edition.) For we must always remember that Luther was 
not at first biased against Romanism, but that he was until 1517, 
and even later, a strong protagonist of the system. Op. his co=ents 
on 1 John 4, 1 iI. 
But as for Lutheran theologians, doubt or hesitation is hardly 
excusable, since our Oonfessions make such clear statements concern-
ing the Antichrist that the issue is clear-cut. We quote, first, from 
the Smalcald Articles: "This teaching shows forcefully that the Pope 
is the very Antichrist, who has exalted himself above, and opposed 
himself against, Ohrist, because he will not permit Ohristians to be 
saved without his power, which, nevertheless, is nothing and is neither 
ordained nor commanded by God. This is, properly speaking, to exalt 
himself above all that is ealled God, as Paul says, 2 Thess. 2, 4 .... 
Therefore, just as little as we can worship the devil himself as Lord 
and God, we can endure his apostle, the Pope, or Antichrist, in his 
rule as head and lord." (Gone. Trigl., 475, §§ 10.11.14.) The last 
statement is incorporated in the Formula of Ooncord, 1059, § 20. We 
quote further from the Smalcald Articles: "Now, it is manifest that 
"Papam Esse Ipsum Verum Antichristum." 435 
the Roman pontiffs, with their adherents, defend [and practise] god-
less doctrines an d godless services. And the marks [all the vices] 
of Antichrist plainly agree with the kingdom of the Pope and his 
adherents. For Paul, 2. Ep. 2, 3, in describing to the Thessalonians 
Antichrist, calls him an adversary of Christ. . .. This being the case, 
all Ohristians ought to beware of becoming partakers of the godless 
doctrine, blasphemies, and unjust cruelty of the Pope. On this ac-
count they ought to desert and execrate the Pope with his adherents 
as the kingdom of Anticill:ist, just as Ohrist has commanded, Matt. 
7, 15: Beware of false prophets. . .. Even though the Bishop of 
Rome had the primacy by divine right, yet, since he defends godless 
services and doctrine conflicting with the Gospel, obedience is not 
due him; yea, it is necessary to resist him as Antichrist. The errors 
of the Pope are manifest and not trifling." (Lac. cit., 515, § 39; 
517, § 41b; 521, § 57.) Other important passages which belong here 
are 499, § 11; 469, § 25; 417, § 98. 
The doctrine of the Antichrist is well summarized by two recent 
teachers of the Lutheran Ohurch. Hoenecke (Ev.-Luth. Dogmati7c, 
IV, 219 ff.) first lists the characteristic features of Antichrist: origi-
nating in the midst of the Ohurch, coming after the working of 
Satan, described as a collective person, having his t111'one in the midst 
of the Ohurch of God, coming forward after the removal of the 
restraining power, and then applies these features to the Papacy. He 
even makes the following sharp remark: "Wir sprechcn dem, eZeT diesen 
Artikcl nicht glaubt, eZie Seligkeit nicht ab, wahl abel' die lntherische 
Kirchengemeinschaft." - Pieper (Ohristl. Dogmatik, III, 527-534) 
speaks in a similar strain, giving as the characteristics of Antichrist: 
apostasy, sitting in the midst of the Ohurch, pretending that he is 
God, active by the working Satan, remaining to the Last Day. This 
he applies to the system of Romanism headed by the Pope as a repre-
sentative person, closing with the words: "J eeZer Lehrer in der 
christZichen K irche ist schwach in del' Thcologie, del', obwohZ er mit 
del' historischcn E1'scheinung eZes Papstes be7cannt ist, im Papsttum 
nicht eZen 2 Thcss. 2 geweissagten Antichrist e1'kennt." 
If we value the pure, the saving doctrine of the vicarious atone-
ment through the blood of Jesus Ohrist, the God-man, in these latter 
days of the world, we shall do well to keep these facts concerning the 
Antichrist in mind, so that we may give heed to the prayer of Luther: 
"lmpleat vas Deus oeZio papae," the hatred being indeed not directed 
against him as an individual, but against him as the representative 
of the system of Romanism, as the collective head uf an organization 
of such a pernicious nature that he, and he alone, is rightly called 
the Antichrist. P. E. KRETZMANN.