Full Text for Die Stellung der Frau in der christlichen Kirche (Text)
Qtnurnr~tu
m4t~1ngiral jinut~ly
Continuing
LEHRE UND WEHRE
MAGAZIN FUER E v.-LuTH. H OMILETIK
T HEOLOGICAL Q UARTERLY-THEOLOGICAL MONTHLY
Vol. I V February, 1933 No.2
CONTENTS
P age
GRAEBNER, THEO. : The Modernistic Christ 81
KROEGER. A. C.: Die Stellung der Frau in der christlichen
Kirche . . ... . , 85
MAIER. W. A.: Archeology - the Nemesis ... 95
SIHLER, E. G.: Studies in Eusebius 102
KRETZMANN. P. E.: Luther und Zuelsdorf . 112
KRETZMANN. P. E.: Our Formula for Infant Baptism . 120
LAETSCH. THEO.: Divorce and Malicious De~rtion . ..... 127
KRETZMANN. P. E.: Die Hauptschriften Luthers in chro-
nologischer Reihenfolge . ... . . 133
Dispositionen ueber die altkirchliche Epistelreihe . 135
Miscellanea .. ... .. .. . .... . . . .. .. . 141
Theological Observer. - Kirchlich-Zeitgeschichtliches 145
Book Review. - Literatur.. .... ... 153
Ein Predlger mUM nleht allein Vlri p.127),
the number of scholars who doubted the validity of the transliterations
and translations ,vas not inconsiderable.
Notable in the lattcr group were critical minds that in spite of
their characteristic inclination to explore new avenues of depal'ture
l'emained anchored on their old critical basis. The great N oeldeke,
prince of Semitists, as late as 1871 declared that the results of As-
syriology both in matters of linguistics and history wel'e characterized
by "a highly suspicious air." The school of Wellhausen, with its
dominant emphasis upon the history of religion, paid scant attention
to archeology and dallied with it as a toy of sophisticated Semitism.
A perusal of Julius Wellhausen's History of israel shows the pro-
nounced indifference with which he regarded Assyriology.
This neglect has proved fatal to many of the theories which have
been set up as canons of criticism. Archeology has convincingly
demonstrated its capacities as a nemesis of higher criticism. Scores
of hasty judgments and other scores of intricate theories, spun out of
critical fancy, now appear as entirely fallacious in the light of
archeological research. And while it is a thankless task to enumerate
".) :'Diefe I5timme aus bem ~teiie unfexer fiibametifanifcl)en ~riii:Jer otingen
hlit um f.o lieber, ba bet SUttifeI 3eigt, bat aud) bDtt im 0eift bet I5d)tift gclc9tt
unb gearbeitet hlitb,ellen aud) in be3ug aUf Mefe fltaftifcl)e j}'tage. :'Die fitcl)licl)e
SUtbelt cl)tiftricl)er j}'rauen fome gan3 nnb gat unter SUufficl)t unb £eltung bet Orfs=
gemeinbe gefcl)el)en. :'Dies fclJ1ie&t feineshlegS aus, bat eine grii&exe fitcl)Iicl)e ~iit=
.perfcl)aft burd) cine f~ftcmatifcl)e Otbnung bet SUrbcit fo(cl)er j}'taucnbmine ein:
grii&ms .Bic! etteicl)en fann. ~. &. ~.