694 Miscellanea Miscellanea The Returning Soldiers Bernard Iddings Bell, lecturer on preaching at the Seabury-Western Theological Seminary i.. Chicago, in an essay on "The Church and the Returning Veteran," in the Dec., 1944, Atlantic Monthly relates how he after extensive research has arrived at a very definite opinion: "It seems an indisputable fact that with the exception of a quite small minority those in the armed forces, officers and men, neither know much nOT care much about Christianity. This is most apparently true of those who call themselves Protestants, less so of Catholics (Roman and Anglican). . .. They have performed their war duties like the valiant young pagans they are, never bothering their heads about God except perhaps when sheer, stark danger of death aroused their longing for supernatural protection -a kind of religious awareness which almost always fades away as soon as the battle is done." We cannot ignore a statement such as this, especially because it is very much like that of other competent observers. Any other conception of the situation is wishful thinking. There is no great spiritual revival sweeping through the armed forces. It is well for us to know that. It will save us boL'l nIne and disappoii"ltment later on. We regret this state of affairs, but it reminds us of a remark of a gray-haired army chaplain, then a major, made a few years ago. "Really," he said, "the Church has begun to worry about most of these men about twenty years too late." He implied that in the Army an increase in religious interest and appreciation was almost too much to be hoped for. What can we expect of that group? Have we reasons to be optimistic? Bernard I. Bell continues: "Not many even of the professedly religious soldiers in either group seem to have much understanding of the more intimate and penetrating devotional implications of their faith, just as few shew t . . ~ a t t . . ~ e y understand the relationship of that faith to their personal behavior. . .. The religion even of those who admit that in some sense they regard themselves as 'religious,' with rare exceptions, seems not to have penetrated much below the surface of their thinking and to have little to do with patterns of conduct." This assertion may be hard to take. It allows of but one conclusion: inadequate religious instruction and training when these men and women were boys and girls. How can they give answer to every man that asketh them a reason of the hope that is in them when they have had but a vague impression or a shallow draught of that hope? How can they be really loyal to Him of whom they have not heard so intensively, so consistently, and so thoroughly that He lived Ln. them and they in Him? Perhaps they themselves, perhaps they to whose spiritual care they were committed at an earlier day, took Christian training too lightly. It would seem as if somewhere someone has failed. Frankly, the prospects are far from bright. We have the "rare exceptions," but, apart from those, we shall doubtless be disappointed if we expect these veterans to flock to our churches immediately upon Miscellanea 695 their return. Surely, we shall be pleased to welcome them and ready, too, but we should also know that many of them will worry not a whit whether we welcome them or not. Most of them have never had any connection with any church, and many others have had only a nominal one. They are looking forward only to good jobs, fine pay, and easy work. Beyond that goal they have never learned to look. These veterans, with negligible exceptions, have, as B. I. Bell also says, "been educated to believe that life's satisfactions overwhelmingly are material and of this world, satisfactions in the pursuit of which the Church certainly is not needed. . .. The American soldier, in other words, is the product of the American system of education, a system which concentrates attention almost wholly on mastery of materials ... with the apparent assumption that man does live by bread alone, though it be desired t . . ~ a t the bread be spread with butter and jam." He has been "miseducated." Ours will be a formidable task -to re-educate grown men and women by the honest and conscientious preaching of the Word, by seeking them out wherever they may be, and by exercising patience and friendly consideration. Jesus Christ, the only Mediator between God and man, is a stranger to them. Close acquaintance with Him cannot be established in a few short hours. Thorough Christian indoctrination takes time. And as we look still farther into the future, let us now resolve to do all we can so that at a later day no one will ever again have reason to say that "we have begun to worry about most of these men twenty years too late." "S." in the Northwestern Lutheran Some More Light on the Origin of Mrs. Eddy's "Science and Health" Recently the pastor of Christian Temple, Baltimore, Md., Dr. Walter M. Haushalter (successor of Peter Ainslie) issued a pamphlet the chief contents of which should be brought to the. attention of our readers. The facts here submitted were known before, but they are given further substantiation by the investigation and judgment of a group of experts whose competency cannot be questioned. The title of the pamphlet is "Validation of the Lieber-Hegel-Eddy Source Document." We herewith quote the greater part of it. "The Metaphysical Religion of Hegel, a manuscript by Francis Lieber giving an exposition of the spiritual philosophy of George William Frederick Hegel, was published in London (Rationalist Press) and in Boston (A. A. Beauchamp) in 1936. This 8,200-word document was published in substance and in photostat with an account of all that was then known of it under the title, Mrs. Eddy Purloins From Hegel. Because the substance of Lieber's essay and its language verbatim was used by Mary B. G. Eddy to the equivalent of thirty-three pages of Science and Health, and since the Lieber Document antedates Mrs. Eddy's book by nine years, The Metaphysical Religion of Hegel has come to be known as the Lieber-Hegel-Eddy Source Document. I was in London in August, 1936, when a two-column review appeared in the London Times Literary Supplement. In the August 22d issue of the London Times 696 Miscellanea Literary Supplement I published, in response to the invitation of the editors, the following statement: "'Your reviewer raises the issue of the authentication of the Lieber Document, expressing the belief that its authenticity is more probable than absolutely proven. There is no tribunal for authenticating historical documents of this nature. For the testing of the Lieber Document appeal was made to the Congressional Library, the American Historial Society, the American Library Association, and the United States Bureau of Standards. Each one disclaimed ability or responsibility for the office. I would welcome the creation of a Documentary Tribunal composed of impartial scholars. The Lieber Document would be placed before such an authorized Tribunal and its judgment would be unquestioned. The publishers and I have been satisfied on its authenticity. We possess bills of sale and sworn affidavits from the family ill whose possession it was for fifty years. Six years have passed since the Lieber papers came into our possession and everything learned about them since confirms the authenticity.' "Now, fourteen years after its discovery and eight years after its publication a Validation of the Lieber-Hegel-Eddy Source Document is herewith published. The Validation is done by a group of American University professors and documentary experts. All did the service without financial compensation and everyone consulted on the matter brought in all opinion affirmative for its authenticity. The expertS consulted were Dr. John French, Librarian of the Johns Hopkins University; Dr. W. Stull Holt, .<\ssociate Professor of Histor.f in Johns Hopkins University; Dr. Sidney Painter, Associate Professor of History in Johns Hopkins University; Dr. Johannes Mattern, Professor of Philosophy in Johns Hopkins University; Mr. Arthur P. Myers, Handwriting and Documentary Expert. The research was conducted in Johns Hopkins University because it is the repository of many accredited writings of Francis Lieber. "The statement of the Johns Hopkins University Professors reads: 'We have examined w i t . . ~ care the docu..-nent entitled Metaphysical Religion of Hegel by Francis Lieber. The evidence presented left no doubt in our minds that the document was written in the 1860's and that its history was as described by Mr. Haushalter. Signed W. Stull Holt, Sidney Painter, John C. French, Johannes Mattern.' Mr. Arthur P. Myers is a handwriting expert of twenty years' professional practice, during which time he has served in many celebrated cases. His statement follows: 'I have made an exhaustive, scientific, microposcopic examination of the Metaphysical Religion of Hegel and I have compared it with authentic writings of Francis Lieber in the Johns Hopkins University Library and I give it as my definite and positive judgment that all the above mentioned writings bearing the name of Francis Lieber were written by one and the same person, My opinion is not based on photostatic copies but on examination of the original documents. It is therefore my judgment that the manuscript The Metaphysical Religion of Hegel by Francis Lieber is a document of unmistakable and unimpeachable authority. To this authenticity I am willing to testify further in court. Arthur P. Myers.' " A. Miscellanea 697 A Note Concerning the Text and Meaning of Acts 16:12 In Classical Philology (Vol. XL, No.2, April, 1945) an article written by Professor J. A. O. Larsen of the University of Chicago has the title "Hellenistic Federalism," which in a note dwells on a point that for a long time has interested students of the New Testament, the true text and meaning of Acts 16: 12. Macedonia once upon a time consisted of several republics. Were the old divisions still extant at the time when Paul made his celebrated second missionary journey which took him to Philippi, Macedonia? Professor Larsen says: "An inscription proving the continued existence of the four republics under the Flavians was published over a generation ago." He continues, "The inscription, in turn, makes it clear that the account in the Acts of the Apostles of Paul's visit to Philippi contains a reference to one of these republics or 'parts,' as they were called, and supplies an additional proof of their survival under the empire." In a special note he looks at the various aspects of the textual and exegetical problems involved, surveys the various solutions that have been proposed, and then gives his own conclusion. With the permission of Classical Philology we herewith reprint his note. "In Acts 16: 12 we find, according to Codex Vaticanus: cIiLAI.rutOU<;, 7\1:L<; tlo1:Lv ltQOO1:T} ~ E Q L l l o <