Full Text for Prof. Franz August Otto Pieper, Dr. theol. (Text)

e uni> barum ittefli~tenbe !BeurteHung bet tiimifd)en .Rird)e. 72, 141. ~um riimifd)en Q;ud)ntiftifd)en .Rongre~ in (;I:ljicngo. 72, 161. ~ft bie .\';)eHige 6d)tift bitefte~ obex nut IInogeleitete~1I !!BOtt @otte~ ~ 72,193. SDet 6d){u~ bes Q;udjnriftifd)en .Rongreffes in (;I:ljicago. 72,225. SDie d)tiftlid)e lReIigion in iljrem merljuHniS 5U aUen anbern lReligionen. 72,257. lJJlitteHungen nus ben me ben, bie oei ber Q;intueiljung unferer 6t. £ouifet t~eologifdjen Illnftalt geljalten tuurben. 72,268. me be sur Q;riiffnung be~ neuen 6tubienjnljrs 1926/27. 72,321. ~um merftunbniS be~ .Rnm.pfes 3tuifd)en bem me~itnnifd)en 6tnnt unb ber fat~oIifd)en .Ritd)e. 72,357. murtuurt. 73, 1. "SDie 6tnbilifierung ber \:3'inansen" in ber d)riitlidjen .Rird)e. 73, 65. SDic grofle lIQ;infreifung~betuegungll gegen bie djriftfid)c .Rird)e. 73,97. SDie Sl)ogmntif, bie geoetet tuetben fnnn. 73, 129. Sl)er ,,£utljerring" in Sl)eutfdjlanb. 73,141. .Reine Illorliftung fcitens bet .Rird)e! 73, 193. ®enligt "Q;rgun3ungsunterrid)t" fUr bie lllus6Hbung treu{ut~erifd)er \j.\a" ftoren 1 73, 195. Sl)ie £utljerftntue bot un[erm tljeo{ogifdjen 6eminnr. 73,289. Sl)ns tue1tfidje lReidj bes \j.\a.pftes a15 IlJJliniaturftaat"1 73, 294. :Die .Rrnft be~ Q;bangeIiums. 73, 321. mortuort. 74, 1. !!Bie tuitb cin (;I:ljrift feinet etuigen Q;ttuulj lung gctuiji 1 74, 97. Sl)ie d)riftIidje .Rird)e unb bie d)riftfidje £e~re. 74, 173. !!Ba~ fann unb foU bie ameritnnifd)dutl)etifd)e .Rirdje bon Illnbreu, (;I:~emni~ unb anbern ®ottesmunnern jener ~eit {emen 1 74, 193. :Das bon D. !!Baftljet l)etbeigefeljnte \j.\fingften ber lutljerifd)en mrd)c Illme" rifas. 74, 208. Q;inige IllntlDorten aUf einige \:3'ragen. 74, 225. ~ur red)ten Illuffaifung bet ~m.peratibe in bet £e~te bon bet !Bdeljrung unb ber Q;rfangung ber 6efigfeit. 74,257. Distinguendum est. 74,289. !!Bie fann innetljalb eine~ lutljctifd)en .Ritd)entiir.per~ bem lllofaU bon bet lutljerifdjen £eI)rc getueljtt tuetben 1 74, 292. ~um status quo bet mminigten £uH)ctifd)en .Ritdje in Illmerifa (U. L. C.). 74,321. ~in !BdcnntniS 5ur nieb unb nagelfeften !Bibd au~ lutljerifd)en .Rreifen. 74,328. mortuort. 75, 1. :Dcr ~tueci bes ~reinen .RatedjiSmus £utljer~. 75, 33. !!Birb aus metanlaffung bet bierljunbertjuljrigen ®ebiidjtniSfeier be~ ~ate" dJiSmus £ut~et~ in Sl)eutfdjlanb cine neue ~cit flit bie "ebanilelifd)e" ~1)tiftenljeit anlitedjen 1 75, 65. :Die \j.\roteftanten bon 6.peiet 1529. 75, 129. lllofdjieb5tuvtte nn \lie .RanbibatenHaffe 1928/29 unb :Dvftor.promotionen. 75, 161. "What Is Unionism?" 565 lIDie unfm @lauben~~ unb mefenntnisgenojfen im ~uil{anbe um unb fUr bas ~tbe bet lReformation fiimlJfen. 75, 163. :iDer offene Sjimme1. 75, 196. :iDie ~inigung bet lutfJerifdjen .R'irdje in ~fJina. 75, 233. :iDtei m1edmale bet xed)ten %fJeologie. 75, 289. :iDie unierte ebangeIifdje 6\)1toile bon !)~orbametUa will fid) nod) welter unieten. 75, 321. Unfere bie~iiifJrige :iDeIegatenf~nobe ill lRiber j}oteft. 75,353. ~in mefud) eines ametitallifd)~lutfJetifd)en !j:laftotil in bet 6d){oflfitdje 3U lIDittenoetg. 75, 360. Concordia Theological Monthly. motwort. I, 2. lI:iDas frudjtoate .l3efen bet 6djriften .l3utfJets." 2,81. :iDet e i n e !j:luntt. 2, 161. Hnfete .l3efJte aUf bem lutfJerifdjen lIDefHonbent in .R'openfJagen. 2, 338. %fJefen, bie bem IItfJeologifdjen 6d){ufle!;amen" bienen flinnen. 2,401. :iDie lIDieberfJo{ung duet falfdjen ~llnage gegen bie m1ijfourif~nobe. 2,481. :iDet lReid)stag 3U ~ugilbutg ber lReidjilta\J bes j}tieilens mit @utt unb beil ettJigen j}riebens im &'dimmer. 2, 641. ~bo!f Sjarnad. 2, 651. ~tjjffnungstebe 3um neuen 6tubienhlf)t 1930/31. 2, 801. D. j}riebridj mente. 2, 81. 2lucf) finb bie ;itljefen aUt furaen ~atfteIIung bet .2eljtfteIIung bet IDCiffoutif~nobe", 2,321 unb 401 (engIifcf), aum grot en ;iteH bie \lttbcit S)etrn D. )jSieper§. )jS. ~. Sl: t e ~ man n. "Wha t Is Unionism?" A question which has been rife in the Lutheran Church for a hundred years; a question which is easily the most important, af- fecting the inner life as also the outward relations to one another of the American Lutheran bodies; a question upon the answer of which, in the opinion of many, depends the future alignment of the various Lutheran synods and federated bodies in the United States. It may also be phrased: What is church-fellowship? or thus: What is the prac- tical application of the confessional principle? Possibly, with a mod- ernistic touch: Why creeds, if any? The present stage of the problem underlying these questions originated in the discussions of a possible federation, or union, be- tween the Missouri Synod, the Ohio Synod, the Iowa Synod, the GeneralOouncil, and the General Synod sixty years ago. The center of debate were the so-called four points - Lodges, Ohiliasm, Altar- and Pulpit-fellowship. We are concerned with the latter two. No one acquainted with the literature of that day will doubt the sin- cerity of the General Oouncil leaders in their efforts to bring about a closer adherence to the confessional principle. Yet from the be-