Full Text for CTM Book Review 15-4 (Text)

m4tn gUI Continuing LEHRE UND WEHRE MAGAZlN PUER Ev.-LuTH. HOMILETIK T HEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY-THEOLOGICAL MONTHLY VoL XV April, 19 No.4 CONTENTS ·co The Right and Wrooc of Private Judgment. Th. Engeldc.r ..... _ .•.. %17 Harnack's Theological Positions. W. Arndt _ ............. %36 Circumcision and Baptism. F. R. Zucker %45 ZS9Outlioes OIl the Standard Gospel Lessons .. Theological Observer ................ . Book Review .................... . EID Pred1ger mllll8 Dleht alleln U1i!i­ cIea, abo duB er die Schafe unter­ welle, wte l1e redlte Cbrtaten IOllen RlD,lODdem auch dmeben den Woel­ fen tIIeh,.... dus I1e die Schafe Dlcht mcreJfal un4 mit falecher Lehre ver­ fuebren UD4 Irrtum. ebduebreD. Luther ! 73 . ..... 283 Ell 1st keln DIq. du elle Leute mehr bet der Kirche behaelt deDn die gute PrecIlgt. ­ Apo&o,fe, An. H If tl)e trumpet give an uneerta1n sound, who abaIl prepare h!mRIf 10 the battle? -1 COf'. J4:' PahDahed for Ev. Lutb. 8J'IIOCI of MJ.oud, OhlD, muI Other Stat.. CONCORDIA PlJBLl8llDfG BOUSE, at. ... _DDDr V.LA. Book Review 283 Book Review All books r eviewed in this periodical may be procured from or through Con- cordia Publishing House, 3558 S. J efferson Ave., St. Louis 18, Mo. The Day of Wrath. A Study of Prophecy's Light on Today. By Harry E. Jessop, D. D. Fleming H. Revell Company, New York, London, and Edinburgh. 119 pages, 5X7ljz. Price, $1.25. It is the same old story - in days of excitement and distress, people, also Christian people, pass by the clear and definite statements of the Holy Scriptures as contained in Isaiah, in the Psalms, in the Gospels, in the Epistles of St. Paul, and in other books of the Old and the New Testament, and turn to the difficult descriptions in the so-called apoca- lyptic books, as Daniel and Revelation. They forget the important hermeneutical principle that the less clear statements given in symbolic language, stressing numbers, speaking about beasts, trumpets, and great woes, should be understood and interpreted in the light of the clear books and passages. This also holds true of the present volume. 1£ only the well-known passage of Luther in his exposition of the 37th Psalm about the clarity and obscurity of Holy Scripture would be kept in mind! The author is the Dean of the Chicago Evangelistic Institute, a Fundamentalist, but, as so many Fundamentalists and teachers at Bible schools and Bible institutes, a literalist. "The day of wrath" is indeed an important Biblical concept which we find stated in many of the Prophets, in Obadiah, Joel, Amos, Isaiah, Zephaniah, and others, and taken up by the Master and His Evangelists and Apostles in the New Testament; but this important term is a complex concept, speaking of important events in the history of the world and of the Church as precursors, forerunners, harbingers of the final consummation and the day of wrath at the end of all things. The destruction of Jerusalem in 587 B. C. and 70 A. D., the first and second World War, and other terrible events in history are "Days of Wrath" and are related to the "Day of Wrath and Revelation of the righteous judgment of God," Rom. 2: 4, as concentric circles to the center. The present volume contains two parts, first, "Why This Slaughter?" second, "Antichrist Is Coming." But if we would go into details, we would have to write a brochure. Compare for the sound Biblical posi- tion Dr. Th. Graebner's War in the Light of Prophecy. L. FUERBRINGER The Principles of Christian Ethics. By Albert C. Knudson, Dean Emeritus Boston University School of Theology. Abingdon-Cokesbury Press, New York, Nashville. 314 pages, 6X9. $2.75. This treatise gives valuable information on the history of Christian ethics and on the divergent teachings regarding various phases of the Christian moral life. And its masterly treatment of the rationale of the principles of Christian ethics together with their application to concrete situations (individual ethics and social ethics, the family, mar- riage, divorce, the State, war, Church and State, economics, etc.) deserves careful study. In so far the book is useful. But what it offers on the 284 Book Review great question of how the Christian life is produced and promoted is altogether harmful. What it teaches in the section dealing with the presuppositions of the Christian ethic is destructive of the Christian moral life. No true Christian life can be built upon the basis which is here proposed. While many of the conclusions reached by Dr. Knudson in his discussion of the Christian duties are in agreement with the teach- ing of Scripture, he takes away the dynamics needed for the Christian performance of these duties. In the first place, in listing the pre- suppositions of Christian ethic he warns against the harmful influence of the monergistic teaching and calls for the application of the semi- Pelagian-Arminian-Synergistic doctrine. He sets down the correct principle: "Man is a sinner and hence, if he is to be saved, if he is to attain to moral purity and to holiness of life, must receive divine for- giveness and experience the transforming power of the divine grace." (P. 64.) But this does not mean sola gratia. We read on page 93: "Against the Pelagian theory of sin there has been an unfavorable reaction on the part of the Church as a whole. The theory does, how- ever, emphasize an important truth, that of man's freedom and respon- sibility. And in the semi-Pelagian or Arminian theory of sin the effort was made to conserve this truth without sacrificing or curtailing the more fundamental religious truth of the divine grace. According to this theory, man's nature was corrupted by the Fall, and as a result his will was weakened, and he was left with a native bias toward evil. . . . According to the theory of monergism, man is not morally well, as the Pelagians affirmed, nor is he morally sick, as the semi-Pelagians taught; he is morally dead. He !;las no independent spiritual vitality. He can of himself do no 'good' thing. He is absolutely dependent upon divine grace for his salvation. He cannot in his own strength co-operate with God in the work of redemption. God does everything. Monergism, not synergism, is the true Christian theory. The strict Augustinian doctrine was revived by Protestant reformers and made basal in their theology. . . ." Our Author takes the semi-Pelagian-Arminian-synergistic side. He declares: ''The various ideas of a primitive Fall, of hereditary or racial guilt, and of the total depravity may be dismissed as unwarranted speculation." (P.lOl.) "This pessimistic tendency to exaggerate the sinfulness and helplessness of man" (p.l04), this "subethical doctrine of original sin." (P.264.) "Lutherans, Calvinists, and other Augus- tinians, who have held to an extreme doctrine of original sin and denied to 'fallen' man real freedom" are advised to renounce their monergism "and accept the synergistic conception of freedom." (pp. 150, 20.) Moner- gism is irrational, and, worse, it is fatal to true morality. Our book's author is most explicit on this point. He knows exactly what we teach. Monergism "makes man completely dependent upon the divine grace for his redemption .... We ourselves, according to this theory, have no real freedom. We are slaves of sin. We can do no good thing. Our every act and thought in so far as it emanates from ourselves is sinful. We cannot avoid such action, and yet we are responsible for it. From this bondage of sin we can escape only through the aid of the Divine Spirit. Real freedom is the ability to do the right, and this is God's Book Review 285 gift to us. We have nothing to do with it ourselves. Weare able to do wrong but not to do the right. . . . By grace we may be made free." What about this teaching? "An endless amount of equivocation and theological legerdemain has been resorted to in the effort to justify this position, but none of the attempts has ever succeeded or ever will succeed in rescuing this theory from its inherent irrationality. . . . It is fatal to true morality." (P. 81.) The only teaching which satisfies the demands of reason and produces true morality is the Arminian-synergistic teach- ing, which holds that "conversion is a work in which the human and the divine co-operate." (P. 105.) We, on our part, declare that the con- version and the morality which is produced in whole or in part by the natural powers of fallen man is a sham. In as far as the theologian and pastor and teacher operates with semi-Pelagianism in any of its various modifications, he makes conversion and the Christian life impossible. - Note, by the way, that the controversy on monergism vs. synergism is not a dead issue, neither in theology nor in practical life. And we thank our author for drawing the issue so clearly. Note, too, that the old sophistry is still being employed. "At bottom the difference [between semi-Pelagianism and monergism] seems to me one of words more than of substance. For both sides lay primary stress on the divine grace." (Pp. 186, 94.) Why, even the Pelagians of old, who ascribed everything to man, used to speak of "the grace" of God. Similarly, in the state- ments that "if a sinner is to be saved, he must receive divine forgivenesss" (p. 64) and that "only through the divine grace can sin be forgiven" (p. 102) the term "gracious forgiveness" is not used in the Biblical sense. Compare statements like these: "Repentance is a change of mind, a godly sorrow for sin, an inner moral transformation. As such it is a sufficient ground for the divine forgiveness." (P. 49.) "The only moral basis for forgiveness is repentance." (P. 247.) In the second place, our book speaks of "the unique significance of the New Testament as the chief source and norm of the Christian ethic." (P. 37.) "We base the view that love is the fundamental principle of the moral ideal on the teaching of the New Testament." (P. 118.) We, too, teach that the New Testament (and all of Scripture) is the chief (the only) norm and, more than that, the only source of the Christian life. The only norm of good works is God's Law, as presented in Scripture, and the power to lead a holy life is supplied only by the Gospel, preached by the Apostles and Prophets. But Dr. Knudson does not consider Scripture to be the inspired, the inviolable, the faithful Word of God. To him Scripture is a human product. For instance: "In the New Testament this doctrine appeared in the teaching of Paul with two or three important modifications. Jesus did not apparently commit himself either to the Fall theory or to the rabbinic conception of the yezer ham (the 'evil imagination' of Gen. 8: 21) . Indeed, he seems not to have raised the question as to the ultimate origin of human sin. Sin was to him an obvious fact ; it was somehow rooted in the human 'heart' ; but just how he did not say. Theorizing on the subject he left to others. And this we find in its most influential form in th e Epistles of Paul, who had probably been predisposed to such speculation by his 286 Book Review rabbinical training. He may have learned the yezer theory from Gamaliel; but, if so, he freely modified it after becoming a Christian. He gave a more definite psychological content to the moral consequences of the Fall by identifying them with the yezer ham, which he thus transformed into a hereditary evil impulse." (P. 91.) According to this the Holy Scriptures are nothing but the pious thoughts of good, learned men. According to that the theorizing of Paul may be criticized, im- proved, or rejected by other learned Christians. Our author does that. He admits that "monergism has some basis in the teaching of Paul" (p. 94), and he feels at liberty to reject it as a false theory! The writings of fallible men, however, cannot serve as the source and norm of Chris- tian ethics. The Word of God is the dynamic producing conversion, justifying men, and producing good works. In the third place, the deity of Jesus Christ and His vicarious atone- ment are not touched upon in this treatise on Christian ethics. What the readers learn about Jesus is that "he did not apparently commit himself to the Fall theory, etc.," that "he not only taught us what the moral idea is; he exemplified it in his own life; he bade us to follow him; ... he is our perfect example" (pp.157,160), and "that he shared the