Full Text for Liturgy and Pietism: Then and Now (Text)

LOGIA A JOURNAL OF LUTHERAN THEOLOGY REFORMATION 1999 VOLUME VIII. NUMBER 4 CONTENTS ARTICLES What Can Presbyterians Learn from Lutherans? D. G. Hart .... : ........................................................................... ~ ..................................................................... . Philip Jacob Speller and the Demise of the Practice of Holy Absolution in the Lutheran Church ' Gerald S. Krispin ............................................................................................................................................................................ 9 Liturgy and Pietism -Then and Now John T. Pless .................................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Map of the Kingdom of Piety Valentine Ernst Loescher, Translated by Matthew C. Harrison . ........................................................................... ......... .......... 29 Oscar Feucht's Everyone a Minister: Pietism us RedivivitS"~-~'~'---""" . Brent Kuhlman ............................................................... , ..................... : ............... :, ............... , ....... : .................... , ... , .. , .. " ............. , .. 31 The Lutheran Confessions on the Holy Ministry with a Few Thoughts on Hoefling David P. Scaer ................. , .......................................................................................... , ........................... ,.,'..................................... 37 The Nicene Creed and the Filioque: A Lutheran Approach David Jay Webber ................... ................................................................................................................................... ......... ........... 45 REVIEWS ................................................................................................................................................. ; ............................................ 53 REVIEW EsSAY: Martin Luther: The Christian Between God and Death. By Richard Marius. Review by Mark Sander The Genesis of Doctrine: A Study in the Foundation of Doctrinal Critidsm. Alister E. McGrath. Shattering the Myths of Darwinism. Richard Milton. Baptism: My Adoption into God's Family. Gaylin R. Schmeling. The Divorce Culture. Barbara Dafoe Whitehead. The Complete Text of the Earliest New Testament Manuscripts. Edited by Philip W COmfort and David P. Barrett. The Undertaking: Life Studies from the Dismal Trade. Thomas Lynch. BRIEFLY NOTED LOGIA FORUM .............................................................................................................................................................................. 63 Luther and Longfellow • Creative Worship ala 1732 • Vieker Installation • Rebuking Pietism Emotions from Philosophy to Pietism • A Pious Walk • Beatitudes a la Pietism Prostituting the Office • Liturgy Video Available • The Spirit of Christmas ALSO THIS ISSUE A Call for Manuscripts .. ....... .............. ................ ......... .................. ............ ......... ...... ....................................... ....... ............... .......... 18 Map (Kingdom of Piety) ................................................................................................................................................... ............. 28 Liturgy and Pietism Then and Now JOHN T.PLESS ---------------------------~------------------------~- V AVID LUECKE' HAS ADVOCATED PIETISM as a slice of the The Pietist movement, which penetrated Lutheran territory Lutheran heritage that holds promise for the renewal of in the latter part of the seventeep.th century and contributed mission, congregational life, and worship. Luecke argues to the diminution or the internal transformation of the that pietism is the "other story"l of worship among Lutherans, a orthodox Lutheran tradition, was· not simply a reaction story that he claims has been ignored by the "restorationists" who against certain weaknesses.in the church life of the time; it have written liturgical histories and prepared the hymnals. was rather a new theological position, which WilS based on a According to Luecke, pietism is part of a tradition that is finding new concept o£reality and which bore within itself the seeds expression in congregations that have abandoned or· radically of the modempoint of view.4 altered traditional Lutheran liturgical forms and hymnody. . .. The alternative worship movement, which has become so Most of the standardt,rea,tments of pietism see pietism as a nec- attractive to many within American Lutheranism, draws mote essary correclive t9 the 'alleged frigidity and formality of Lutheran deeply on revivalism or the "frontier tradition"z of.worsh:il?i::'II& __ ~odo:xr.Pietism is,.said to have recaptured the vitality of James White calls it, and pentecostalism via the charismatic move- ,. .. Luther"s evangelical jnsight Examples of the living piety of ortho- ment, than it does on classical pietism. One could only wish that doxy as embodied inJohann' Gerhard's devotional writings or the contemporary praise hymns had the theological and spiritual hymnody of Philip Nicolai and Paul Gerhardt are ignored, or else depth of hymns such as Johann Schroeder.'s "One Thing's Needful; they are classified as a germinal form ofpietism.5 Pietism's Lord this Treasure" (277 LW), which WIlhehn Nelle. called ,"the reliance on a selected slice of !;he early Llfther to the exclusion of most blessed hymn of the entire circle of Halle. Pietists."3 his later sacrameo.ta1 writings is overlooked. Whatever deficiencies When we compare the changes in liturgical texts and structures there may have.'been in the Ghurch life of Llltheran orthodoxy, it introduced by pietism with those brought about by the advocates cannot be claimed that pietism was a return to Luther. Pietism of so-called alternative worship, we might be tempted to conclude was seeking something new. Jeremiah Ohl summarizes the out- that the innovations of pietism were rather minor. For the most come of pietism's search as it relates to worship: part, pietism did not produce new liturgical orders. What pietism did was to shift away from the centrality of the divine service in the life of the church. This shift was necessitated by a prior shift from justification to sanctification, from the objective reality of the means of grace to the subjective experience of the belieyer, from beneficium to sacrijicium, from the office of the holy min- istry to the priesthood of believers. This was the crucial shift that prepared the way for later developments in pietism's offspring, revivalism and pentecostalism, which in turn have exercised a destructive influence in the liturgical life of North American Lutheranism. The central themes of pietism were unable to sus- tain the liturgical life envisioned in the Book of Concord. If we are to understand the influence of pietism on the liturgy in contemporary Lutheranism, it is. essential that we see that pietism was more than a renewal movement. It was a theological movement. Bengt Haegglund writes: JOHN T. PLESS is pastor of University Lutheran Chapel, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and is book review editor for LOGIA. This essay was first pre- sented at the Pieper Lectures at Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, on September 18, 1998. 19 in a word, what pietism: set out to do finally resulted not in brmging.about again· a proper union between the objective and the subjecti"~, but in the overthrow of the former and the triumph ({the latter. The sacramental and the sacrificial were divorce'c( and the sacrificial alone remained. Public worship ceased to be a celebration of redemption, and .. became only an act of edification. 6 Pietism succeeded in introducing a new theology of worship grounded not in the delivery oithe fruits of Christ's redeeming work but rather in the edification of the saint. While Spener in his programmatic work Pia Desideria did not set forth a plan for liturgical innovation, we observe a shift away from objective understanding of the divine service in Luther and Lutheranorthodoxyl Spener began not with the1f.)rd's gifts but with the Lord's people, and what he saw was lamentable: clergy whose lives did not conform to their teaching, contentiousness among the theologians, worldliness and drunkenness on the part of the common people. When Spener finally came to discuss the efficacy of the word of God and the place of baptism, the Lord's Supper, and absolution, he focused not on the character of these gifts but on their right use. Spener gave assurances that he had not departed from the orthodox Lutheran understanding of the power of God's word: We also gladly acknowledge the power of the Word of God when it is preached, since it is the power of God for salva- tion to everyone who has faith (Rom 1:16). We are bound diligently to hear the Word of God not only because we are commanded to do so but because it is the divine hand which offers and presents grace to the believer, whom the Word itself awakens through the Holy Spirit.s Likewise he affirmed baptismal regeneration and the sacramen- tal presence of Christ's body and blood: Nor do I know how to praise Baptism and its power highly enough. I believe that it is the real "washing of regeneration and renewal in the Holy Spirit" (Ti 3:5), or as Luther says in the Catechism, "it effects forgiveness of sins, delivers from death, and grants (not merely promises) eternal salvation. Not less gladly do I acknowledge the glorious power in the sacramental, oral, and not merely spiritual eating and drinking of ilie body and blood of the Lord in the Holy Supper. On this account I heartily reject the position of the Reformed when they deny that we receive such a pledge of salvation in, with, and under ilie bread and the wine, when iliey weaken its power, and when they see in it no more than exists outside the holy sacrament in spiritual eating and drinking."9 Yet after confessing these gifts, Spener once again returns to what he observed in the majority of those who heard the word, were baptized, and received Christ's body and blood. It was not enough to be baptized. Baptism is described as a two-sided covenant: from God's side a covenant of grace, from man's side a covenant of faith.lO The efficacy of the Word is judged in light of what it accomplishes in the interior life of the auditor. Spener writes: But it is not enough that your ear hears it. Do you let it penetrate inwardly into your heart and allow the heavenly food to be digested there, so that you get the benefit of its vitality and power, or does it go in one ear and out the other?ll . Spener worried that confession and absolution as well as the Lord's Supper were being used opus operatum,l2 In his desire to guard against a fleshly securitas, Spener undermined the certain- ty of faiili so clearly articulated in Luther's sacramental writings. In part 3 of Pia Desideria, Spener provides six proposals to correct conditions in the church. His first proposal is "a more extensive use of the Word of God among us."!3 Spener notes that there already is frequent and in some cases daily preaching in the churches. But increased preaching was not what Spener had in mind. The lectionary provides the church with a limited expo- sure to Scripture. Later Gottfried Arnold would conclude that the pericopal system is a vicious and abominable mutilation of the Bible; and Spener himself declared: "How I wish with all my heart, that our Church had never adopted the use of Pericopes, but had allowed a free choice, or else had made the Epistles instead of the Gospels the chief texts."14 Quoting 2 Timothy 3:16, Spener argues that as all Scripture is inspired by God "all Scripture, without exception, should be known by the congregation if we are to receive the necessary benefit."15 Spener offers three suggestions for the increased use of the Bible: (1) Every housefather should have a Bible, or at least a New Testament, and read it aloud for his household daily; (2) books of the Bible should be read one after another at specified times in public services of the congregation; (3) special meetings should be organized for the reading and application of the Scriptures. It is the development of this third point that was to be most influential in pietism. . According to Spener, these gatherings would be "the ancient and apostolic kind of church meeting."16 These meetings were not designed to replace the divine service but to supplement it. Spener describes how these assemblies would function: In addition to our customary services with preaching, other assemblies would also be held in the manner which Paul describes them in 1 Corinthians 14:26-40. One person would not rise to preach (although the practice would be continued at other times), but others who have been blessed with gifts and knowledge would also speak and 1'resenttheir pious opinions on the proposed subject to the judgment of the rest, doing all this in such a way as to avoid disorder and strife. This might conveniently be done by having several ministers (in places where a number of them live in a town) meet together or by having several members of acongrega- tion who have a fair knowledge of God or desire to increase their knowledge meet under the' leadership of a minister, take up the Holy Scriptures, read aloud from them, and fra- ternally discuss each verse in order to discover its simple meaning and whatever may be useful to the edification of all. Anybody who is not satisfied with his understanding of a matter should be permitted to express his doubts and seek further explanation. On the other hand iliose (including the ministers) who have made progress should be allowed the freedom to state how they understand each passage. Then all that has been contributed, insofar as it accords with the sense of the Holy Spirit in the Scriptures, should be careful- ly considered by ilie rest, especially by ilie ordained minis- ters, and applied to the edification of the whole meeting.17 Thus the conventicle was born as a paraliturgical assembly. Spener outlines what he sees to be the benefits of these assemblies. Preachers would gain a more intimate knowledge of the spiritual weaknesses of their people while ilie people would grow in confidence in their ministers. Those who participate would expe- rience personal growth better enabling them to give religious instruction to their children and servants at home. Both sermons and the private reading of the Bible wouid beJ:)~t1:er understood. LITURGY AND PIETISM -THEN AND NOW The apostolic admonition of Colossians 3:16 would be fulfilled as "psalms, hymns, and spiritual songs" were used in these gather- ings "for the praise of God and the inspiration of the partici- pants."18 While Spener did not envision the conventicle as a replacement for the divine service, the history of pietism provides evidence that these meetings, not the divine service, came to be the focal point of the spiritual life. illtimately the songs of the con- venticle would find their way into the liturgical services. The objectivity (extra nos) of the means of grace is overcome by the subjectivity of the believer's experience. directed toward the inner man, may ever be strengthened more. On the other hand, works should be set in motion that we may by no means be content merely to have people refrain from outward vices and practice outward virtues and thus be concerned only with the outward man, which the ethics of the heathen can also accomplish, but that we lay a right foundation in the heart, show that what does not pro- ceed from this foundation is mere hypocrisy, and hence accustom the people first to work on what is inward (awak- en love of God and neighbor through suitable means) and only then to act accordingly.21 21 Spener broadened his understanding of the goal of the sermon to include the sacraments also. Worship is internalized. One should therefore emphasize that the divine means of Word and sacrament are concerned with the inner man. Hence it is not enough that we hear the Word with our out- ward ear, but we must let, it penetrate to our heart,. so that Other themes in Pia Desideria were developed that would we may hear the Holy' Spirit speak there, that. is, with influence the shape ofliturgYwithin pietism.Spener's second pro- vibrant.emotioll and comfort feel the sealing of the Spirit posal calls for "the establishment and diligent exercise of the spiritll- a!1d the power oftheWo):d. NQr is it enough to be baptized, al priesthood."19 The spiritual priesthood was seen in CQutL~lJ:~ but the inner man; where we have put on Christ in the office of the holy ministry. While Spener argued that members -"Baptism,< must als.c,>lrmlf.' \\i.,,11I1' (St. Louis: Concordia Publishing House, 1984). (Baltimore: T. Newton i-:urtl. Iii",). l!1$zt •. B, Philip Jacob Spener, Pia Desideria, trans. Theodore Tappert 41. For a study of dw ':1[~mlf!(li'1!l> '1;,'!W''''11 pi~liml .and Ihc (h.uil\· (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1964), 63, rnatic movement see Carter t.i't,lh~·r~., 111<' 111iffd R~mldff .. mr (M'.((In. 9. Ibid., 63. GA: Mercer University l)re" ... 19~~ j. 10. Ibid., 66. In contrastto Spener, note Luther's understanding of the 42. Pietism wru;. inf11scllL{,«.i lw ',I:""l'ral IHm ·Iulmram !HUllil:mJ.rllh. ?aptismal "covenant" as described by Bryan Spinks, "Luther's Timely including English Purilani~m, ~",. lilm\ .... Sidn. Philipp JdkJ.1I, Sp.'neff ': O\cologyofUnilateralBaptism" Lutheran Quarterly (Spring 1995): 23-45· Pietist Patrwrc1! (Chkago: CO\,'I."I1MIII~\."I", I~I. ~"4l!, 1m ,1Il.t(o;:uum 11. Spener, 66. of how young Spencr w.a~ m;)~'l.i I.".. Ih~ dil1r"tronlll WlillllS!' ()f du,' 12. Ibid. Puritan divines. Also nntl? f\ l'.mc~t St!wtll~·f. nil' Ri!e ;l~illl~. Ttl!!!. im!iilt'mflct' i.~ 15. Spener,88. reflected in the hymn5 whld, thtl pirihl~ \Wfl! wdlmg b) lfll;mpt\t<4tc mto 16. Ibid., 89. their hymnals. 17. Ibid., 89-90. 43. 11111' Other Song 8(1(tk, i:llmpik:d hy H,witt Andcoon (Minnt'.tpoiil;: lB. Ibid.,91. Worldwide Publications, 19<114>', ii'l~Wc (nmt ~~r. 19. Ibid., 92. 44. John WeoolJ ... Pi:I1'tism: The fifili 01' (lnti \~I'hkh. , , l'1amn in Ihi.' 10. Ibid., 95. Heart of German),.' in Piot($l;1m $prfikwrllhtlfigiilll'b, ~d. llfilnk :icnn 21. Ibid.,116-117. (New York: Paulist Pn,'j,~ 19&'1). IlIh1. 22. Ibid., 117. On this point see VilmQS Vatja, ''Worship and 45. Note Kri1ipiil: "VK1thml ~llflt""l1~ tu Ihc (}nd wh~.liill .lk'lcnt:c W4~. Sacramental Lif!;" ill The C,uthemn Church Past and Present, ed. Vdmos both fult lind awcroll1e in Oft~'s own ... FJ(plrilm~ lllliO (./Iffit! Vatja (Minneapolis: Augsbur-gPublishing Bouse, 1977), 128-131. to be the me'.mlrt! of 1-'- IllUma~ Mlun;c of mnh" (I'll). 23. This was the criticism of Valentin Loescher, The Complete 46. Philil) Bi~l. "lhc 1.~(;ttjj()6@!fy (Alllivlly of tlw Chwd\ .. , Or 'I~n Timotlrclls Verinus, trans. James Langebart<;l$ 3};ld Robel:l KoeshH HrosollS' to Kick th~ ~'1ioo~ry H$hl~." \\~Nh!p intlm,oartvm (Wll'lll:f (Milwaukee: Northwestern Publi¥ting House. 1998), 63"'92.~.",,,_,1~97', 6-7. Gerald Krispin, Propter Absolutionem: Hf!ly Absolution in the Theology of ,. "',' 41·"'ibid..7. Martin LlIther and Philipp Jacob. Spener: A Comparative Study 48. Robert Nordile lind Philip Uk~l, HI': Goo' of tilt CitfJf'el: GP4I'~ (Unpublished doctoraldisseJ,iation, Concordja Seminary, St Louis, 1992), Purpose it, Saving Yt'Jf4 (S'.I.mI!.Jl.: O;mwrdiA PublWtll'll JioUU', 199.1), hlf 1(\0-161. an excellenlllnalysis of lhA~ ur~dl?if1811robk'm ':It thli book. ~ l!dwotrd 24 Frank Senn, Christian Liturgy; Catholic and Evangelical Kettner, "the "Tbird w:c.lf 1Iw illiW'ilInd ahll Hnmi!d.kti). 19S,. (New York: Pau\ist Press, 1983), 117, 52,. See TImotby Wdght. ,<\ ('.Armmtmif, of /t1ft'·How 10 Cl'td'4' 30. Ibid., 118. CQntemporary \1tbnhip (Na1J,i1viDe: Abill~ ~ •• ~l). as'~ltg. 31. Ibid, 120. 53· See li. BroM;., Hoilfield. A Hf;wry ;Jf AutiJfld (~fI" in Amt'r"d: 32. Ibid. From SalmliolJ 10 Sdf·RetJli~d(ll' (N/I.~hvilk: Ab~Pm!l, 1\l8,). 33. "The Church Agenda (Liturgy) of 1748:' dmcprdja .Historical 54 Carter Lmdb~ "'Pidbm liIOO lht- dUID::h Growd, MllWlmnt in It/stiMe Quarterly (Summer 1998): 98. a C..onfessional Lutheran Penpmjl."t,~ (::4m{"~ia ~k<:tl Qlwl1''flj 34 Ibid., 98. . (April-July 1988); 130. " 35. Ibid., 99· This form survives in the S~tvice Book and Hymnal $5. Carl George, Pt~r? ""iUtl;! (Gland ~i:di: (1958): "Almighty God, our heavenly Father, hath had. . mercy upon us, Fleming H. Revcll. 1991}, (1). Al$(} ~ tilt: rINkrw. ~ by 1'lmothv Quill. and for the sake of the suffe~gs, death, and r~urrection o~h~ dear Son, "Meta~Cburch and its Iml:tli~.mm f~w;;$ Conr~ l,ufuffll.n dmid,." Jesus Christ, our Lord, forgIveth us all our SlllS. As a Mb;UsteJ:of the LoaM 2 (RefOrmation 1993), 61 =~ Church of Christ, and by h~ au~o~ty, 1 there!0re de?are unto to you 56. See Kennelh Wieting" '"11llt: Mt.'tOOd of Mtlll·(huKh: 1'hc Polm tlf who do truly repent and believe 1Il him, the enure forgryeness of all your 'IhIth and the Point!l that lhlUbk>:' '.00111 a U-kl!y 1nnity 1991): 14 -10, sins: In the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. Also see "The Opinion of rile DepMtnlt'flt of Sptmlfltlc 1'heolug.y on Amen .... On the o~er.hand, by the, sawe authority, I d~dare. ~to the 'Meta~Chun:h':' OmrordiIA T~(f;d Ql~tllr«JWy 1m): 111)- U4. impenitent and unbelievmg, that so long as they continue m theu-tmpen- 57. Ernest Ihins 36. S0alk,45. House, 1970). Urand's fint (.hilptell'" mlitlN "10 IW m..'Ulvtd; 17=;0. 37· Ibid., 46-47· " . ,. For a Luthentn evaluatioo of the ~ of Ii¥)' ~iID.' in the liturgy. fi« 38. See Rob.er: F. Sch~~ !,I~nry Me\chi?r Muhlen?e~gs RelatIon to Timothy Quill, The Impact of 'h~ lilUrgim1 ~ltm 1m Ammcdn the Ongoing Ple~t Tradition,. m ~utherantsm and PIetism, ed. August Lutheranism (Lanham. MD: S<.tJCCI'UW PM£, ,,,,,), ISl-16;r; lind I Suelflow (St LoUIS: Lutheran Histoncal Conference, 1992),40-66. Thomas Wmger. "Assi$.ting Minu,1Cr!S." 1.00M '1 (~de 19'98): 6(:0-67.