LIFE WORLD of the For the July 2001. Volume Five, Number Three Who Is the “Perfect” Pastor? - p.3 Recovering Christian Spirituality for the Family - p.6 The What and Why of Lutheranism - p.9 The Church in the World - p.12 In the Field - p.20 Tornado Coverage - p.27 F E A T U R E S page 12 2 For the Life of the World For theLIFE WORLDofthe PRESIDENT Rev. Dr. Dean O. Wenthe PUBLISHER Rev. Scott Klemsz EDITOR Rev. John T. Pless ASSISTANT EDITOR Monica Robins ART DIRECTOR Steve Blakey For the Life of the World is published quarterly by Concordia Theological Seminary Press, 6600 North Clinton Street, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46825. No portion of this publication may be reproduced without the written consent of the publisher of For the Life of the World. Copyright 2001. Printed in the United States. Postage paid at Fort Wayne, Indiana. To be added to our mailing list please call 219/452-2150 or e-mail Rev. Scott Klemsz at CTSNews. For the Life of the World is mailed to all pastors and congregations of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in the United States and Canada and to anyone interested in the work of Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne, Ind. 3 Who Is the “Perfect” Pastor? By the Rev. Dr. Dean O. Wenthe, Professor of Exegetical Theology and President, Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne, Ind. How can our students become “perfect” pastors? The Scriptures and our Lutheran Confessions have rightly resisted portraying the pastoral office as “above” the laity or possessing a special grace. 6 Recovering Christian Spirituality for the Family By the Dr. Beverly Yahnke, Executive Director of Christian Counseling Services, Milwaukee, Wis. The media have profiled the decline of the American family with heart-breaking trend lines and graphic video portraits. The media, however, have missed the point. The well-kept secret is that the postmodern family is in spiritual crisis. 9 The What and Why of Lutheranism By the Rev. Prof. Lawrence R. Rast, Assistant Professor and Chairman of Historical Theology, Concordia Theological Seminary, Fort Wayne, Ind. Was Luther a conservative or radical reformer? This con- flict is at the heart of what divides American Lutherans. Lutheranism in America is like a bowl of alphabet soup: ELCA, LCMS, WELS, ELS, and others. 12 The Church in the World By the Rev. Matthew Harrison, Executive Director of Board for Human Services, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, St. Louis, Mo. The church in the world reaches out to the lost, the per- ishing, the weak, and the poor in body and spirit as a result of the very incarnation and atonement of Christ. 20 In the Field By Monica Robins Featuring the Rev. Scott T. Porath, Pastor of Immanuel Lutheran Church, Eagle, Neb. 27 Tornado Coverage Read about the devastation to the seminary campus and the experiences of those on campus when the tornado struck. CONTENTS page 9 page 6 page 27 page 3 W here in the world is the church? That’s the first question that must be answered as we consider the role of the church in this world. Ignatius ofAntioch (CA110) simply answered: “Ubi Christus, ibi ecclesia,” “Where Christ is, there is the church.” Looking for the church in the world? She’s easy to find. She’s where Christ is. And where is Christ? Ignatius answered that by stating, “Ubi episcopus, ibi Christus,” “Where the bishop is, there is Christ.”We Lutherans say much the same thing in a slightly different way, “in order that we may obtain this faith, the ministry of teaching the Gospel and administering the Sacraments was instituted. For through the Word and the Sacraments, as through instruments, the Holy Spirit is given, and the Holy Spirit produces faith, where and when it pleases God, in those who hear the Gospel” (Augsburg Confession V). Note that, in locating the church, neither Ignatius nor theAugsburg Confession begins with, or even includes, the good 12 For the Life of the World By the Rev. Matthew Harrison TheChurch in theWorld JULY 2001 13 deeds of believers. Both begin with Christ (Word and Sacrament deliv- ered by an office). And yet Article Six of the Augsburg Confession quickly follows: “Our churches also teach that this faith is bound to bring forth good fruits and that it is necessary to do the good works com- manded by God.” It’s rather simple then: The church is where Christ is, and where Christ and the church are, there good deeds are going on. With this there can be no doubt of the primary focus of the church: the procla- mation of the saving Gospel of Christ, and the administration of the Sacraments. But has the church no role in the world beyond this procla- mation and administration? We confess that she does, and precisely for the sake of the Gospel. “What” the church is to be doing in the world is answered by Christ, just as surely as the “where” of the church is located and answered in Him. One need only peruse the gospels, beginning with John 1:14, “The Word became flesh and dwelt among us.” A recent trip took me to St. Peter’s Cathedral in Geneva, the church where John Calvin preached. The inviting medieval structure beckons from the exterior. But once inside, the starkness of a sanctuary denuded of crucifix, altars, paintings, and statuary by the Geneva reformers leaves the heart cold. Calvin lays buried in the city cemetery not far distant, in a plot marked only with a small stone (not but eight inches square) inscribed “JC.” Here the intended earthly denial and heavenly austerity have crossed over to a denial of the fullness of both earthly and heavenly realities. Here one finds no celebration of life and God’s First Article gifts and their redemption in Christ, rather a denial of them. Calvin’s famous dictum “the finite is incapable of the infi- nite” is what ought to be scribed above the old cathedral doors. Lutheranism knows no such separation of earthly and heavenly. In Christ, the infinite met the finite and bound them inextricably together for eternity, also promising us such an enfleshed eternity. Since His enfleshment in the womb of Mary, Christ affirmed this life and all creation. Salvation at the last will be no elimination of the “flesh” (i.e., sin) AS THOUGH this meant the loss of the “fleshly” (i.e., life as a living, breathing, tangible, blood- filled, heart-beating reality). We know from the very resurrection of Christ that heaven will be a real- ity more tangible, more “real” than what this surreal sin-distorted cre- ation affords us. What this means, I’m convinced, is that “where Christ is” (the church), there can be no proclamation of the Gospel that does not result in, come with a concern for, lives here and now (‘faith is bound to bring forth . . .’). In other words, the impulse for the church’s good deeds in the world is rooted more deeply than the mandate of good deeds itself. The church in the world reaches out to the lost, the perishing, the weak, and the poor in body and spirit as a result of the very incarnation and atonement. Witness Christ in the gospels. Whenever Jesus shows up, the blind receive their sight, the lepers are cleansed, the lame walk, the demon-possessed are freed. Jesus came to “proclaim good news to the poor.” He says of preaching, “For this I came” (Mk. 1:38), yet this proclamation of forgiveness is never in isolation from concern for the whole man’s wellbeing and salvation (soul and body). The same Jesus The church in the world reaches out to the lost, the perishing, the weak, and the poor in body and spirit as a result of the very incarnation and atonement. Wit- ness Christ in the gospels. When- ever Jesus shows up, the blind receive their sight, the lepers are cleansed, the lame walk, the demon-possessed are freed. TheChurch in theWorld For the Life of the World who speaks so eloquently of the necessity of the sheep hearing the voice of the Shep- herd for life eternal (John 10) proceeds to raise Lazarus from the dead. And this is recounted in the context of John’s gospel, in which Jesus’ favorite description of sal- vation is bodily resurrection (Jn. 6:40, 54; 11:24). Where Christ shows up in the gospels, heaven breaks out. Sin is forgiven. People are cured. We are offered in the healing accounts of the gospels a proleptic glimpse of heaven. True, it remained a proleptic glimpse then and remains that for us now. If Christ today dwells in His church via His Gospel preached and Sacraments administered, can we deny that there is healing going on in the church today? Who of us would deny it? Who of us has not seen personally a remarkable turn of medical events in an individual for whom we prayed, to whom we administered the Sacra- ment? Yet, we must admit that in this mean time, all the glory of Christ lays veiled under the cross. Lazarus was raised, but he soon died a second death. Through the transgression of one man, all died. The wages of sin is death. None of us can escape the portal through which we must leave this life. So there’s no point in putting “heal- ing” or “wholeness” at the center of our theology. That would displace Christ and his cross. “Wholeness” remains secondary; always contingent upon the cross as Christ wills it for His purposes in this life, and fully only in the next. And if Christ today dwells in His church, then, ought not, or how can the church not be a refuge for the poor, the hurting, and the sick? How can she not be the voice for those who have no voice? It is, to be sure, the responsibility of government, the left-hand kingdom, to see that the weak and vulnerable are cared for and protected, but what of those places where government has ceased to govern and protect the divinely- given dignity of individuals and orders of society? What of our inner cities where, under the weight of human sin, governmental neglect of its role as bearer of justice and insurer of marriage, has meant the return of “tohoo va vohoo” (chaos, Gen. 1). What of a culture of death that has apparently inextricably found its refuge under the “nose” of the “most Christian nation on earth”? If we believe in the incarnation of Christ and His fundamental affirmation of creation and life itself, if we believe in the atonement of Christ and the blood-bought value of every life, if we believe the gospels, we can- not but care for the ill, be a voice for the weak and oppressed, and so far as possible, be the means for the healing of the sick or caring for the orphan. Perhaps we’d rather “just preach the Gospel.” We could do so indeed, and preach the full Gospel of full forgiveness in the cross of Christ. And God would, no doubt, continue to bring many to faith. But we’d be preaching the full Gospel of only half a Christ. And how much of our preaching would be heard as hollow, faith without love, a mere clanging cym- bal (I Cor. 13)? I propose nothing new. Our forebears organized orphanages, “pilgerhauses” for immigrants, hospitals, and retirement homes. Many of these institutions are still in existence—one of every three not-for-profit nursing home beds in this country is pro- vided by a historically Lutheran institution. The challenges before us are enormous. The church cannot, shall not solve all that troubles (“The poor you shall always have with you . . .”). But shall we redouble efforts to love our neighbor, body and soul? If we are Christ’s church, there is no question. For where there is Christ, there is the church. And, as the church bears witness to Christ’s saving Gospel, she cannot but love the neighbor. The Gospel is full, complete, and perfect—our acts of love and mercy that flow from it are not. But then they, too, are proleptic, the clear indication that salvation is for the whole person for a flesh and blood eternity. Augsburg Con- fession, Articles 4, 5, and 6 form an unbroken whole as well. The Rev. Matthew Harrison is the Executive Director of the Board for Human Care Ministries of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. If we believe in the incarnation of Christ and His fundamental affirmation of creation and life itself, if we believe in the atone- ment of Christ and the blood- bought value of every life, if we believe the gospels, we cannot but care for the ill, be a voice for the weak and oppressed, and so far as possible, be the means for the healing of the sick or caring for the orphan. 14